Jump to content

User talk:Dl2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gevlare (talk | contribs) at 08:47, 9 February 2016 (→‎Disclaimer CityFALCON). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives
  1. Do not post or modify messages in the archives - use this current page instead.
  2. And do not repost messages that have been archived!

---

White Croats

I rewrote the article White Croats with over 120 ref-notes. Previous had templates of Original research and Refimprove, for obvious reasons, but don't understand their return by you for current revision? Is there some issue I didn't notice? As for the infobox, it's just unnecessary as there's no info to put in it, and if was (and don't know which - previously only under language Lechitic, which is obvious OR), don't see how much it would improve the article.--Crovata (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Can you be specific and tell me what is the wrong with my edits? because my first edit i reverted the content which was removed by IP address [1], and the second i fixed the problems of references [2]. I think you made a mistake and you should restore my edits on Al-Nassr FC. Hazel (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you reverted my edit?

How was that vandalism? Sorry I'm new to editing wikis, but it's a proven fact that cyclobenzaprine is significantly less effective at treating skeletal muscle pain than carisoprodol. I didn't say cyclobenzaprine wasn't safer, I said it was less effective, which is true.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.171.231.193 (talk • contribs)

Wrong number - haven't edited Carisoprodol or Cyclobenzaprine, at least in recent times. @Jytdog  reverted your edit because you did not provide a source for that "proven fact". Without such verifiability, anyone could declare "facts" such as Elvis Presley inventing the Nitrogen laser. Dl2000 (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kota Hazrat Nizamuddin Jan Shatabdi Express

Hi there,

Could I have your opinion on Leo Frank's edit for Kota Hazrat Nizamuddin Jan Shatabdi Express. My opinion is that it removes a large amount of information that makes the page what it is.

Superfast1111 (talk) 11:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies.

Dear Dl2000,
I apologize for removing this template, thereby causing you some unnecessary work to re-instate it.
I think it was only in the 'W' list, which is why I removed it, for consistency. Again, I am sorry if I did something wrong.
Please let me know if it should also be inserted in all the other lists, and I'll propagate it across there too. Thank you.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 21:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Inykhnum

Hi there. I undid your revert on Inykhnum. The changes I did are part of an update project. Our portal is working on meeting a new and more reader friendly standard. As a member of this project I work especially on early dynastic nobles and officials. My changes are always patrolled by my co-authors, thus no vandalisms. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 09:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content for WMH

Hello,

Thank you for your message. I've requested a username change purely because I take your advise it could be misconstrued as COI - which it isn't. This article and any amendments are purely for factual purposes, not promotional. No monies or any other kind of promotion has taken place with the items cited. Perhaps a little too much citing has taken place; however that was purely to ensure that the content remained factual and not "fluffy" or "promotional" in anyway.

Please advise further with any further recommendations. I wish to follow all guidelines.

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmhagency (talk • contribs) 16:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer above CityFALCON article

Dear, Dl2000!

Above the article on CityFALCON (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CityFALCON) there is a window which state, that the article uses unreliable sources, but there are links on such sources as Forbes, Businessinsider etc. What shall I do to make sources more reliable? Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gevlare (talk • contribs) 08:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disclaimer CityFALCON

DI2000 thank you for the reply and for the link! I have read wiki article on reliable sources. Now I suggest to delete any links that you consider not to be reliable. They are almost duplicate each other so any valuable information won't be lost. Thank you in advance! Preceding unsigned comment added by Gevlare (talk • contribs) 10:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dl2000&oldid=704064473"