User talk:Caradoc29105

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khamis Gaddafi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khamis Gaddafi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Fitzcarmalan. Your recent edit to the page 2014 Libyan conflict appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Khamis Gaddafi, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 01:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yo. Mic Check. Caradoc29105 (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EternalFloette (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Caradoc29105 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Caradoc29105 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:Caradoc29105|Caradoc29105]] ([[User talk:Caradoc29105#top|talk]]) 21:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Caradoc29105|Caradoc29105]] ([[User talk:Caradoc29105#top|talk]]) 21:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Caradoc29105|Caradoc29105]] ([[User talk:Caradoc29105#top|talk]]) 21:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Caradoc29105 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]