User talk:AnemoneProjectors

Archives: 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016

List of EastEnders episodes (1995) etc...

Hey,

I've noticed these articles of yours, like User:AnemoneProjects/List of EastEnders episodes (1995), I was wondering if I could add stuff to them, such as episode summaries or guest characters and that?

Thanks,

Grangehilllover (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Grangehilllover: at the moment, User:Soaper1234 is adding all the cast lists, so that's sorted, and User:Kelvin 101 is working through the pages to add the lists of episodes (with dates and credits where available). Have a look at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes, which has at the top, a list of the drafts that have been started. Summaries are not as important as getting full lists of episodes with dates and credits, but if you want to add episode summaries, have a look at the ones marked "without summaries" or "needs more summaries", and you are free to add summaries to them - just make sure they are in your own words, are in present tense, give context (as if you do not know how characters are related or what happened in the previous year) and are concise - as you can probably see, in 2015 and 2016 I am trying to keep them to no more than 4 lines (on my screen at least) and in 2013, I was trying to keep it to 2 lines, but they'll probably be expanded anyway as earlier ones have been written longer than the later ones I added in that year. Once we have all the lists completed (with or without summaries), they'll be moved to mainspace where anyone can edit them anyway. Any questions should be asked at User talk:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes, which is where we are collaborating. Thanks. Anemone Projectors 19:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

OK, thanks.

Grangehilllover (talk) 14:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Grangehilllover: Hi you don't happen to have any sort of episode lists for EastEnders do you? I remember you mentioned you had quite a few episodes in your collection. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of EastEnders episodes, from its old location at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes (article). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish my drafts to be moved, and I already had a discussion with someone who was moving drafts I watch to draftspace, who promised mine and those of other long-standing users would not be moved to draftspace. Anemone Projectors 19:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add that this particular page is part of a series of drafts currently being worked on by three or four users and when they are all finished, all 32 of them will be moved, by me, to the mainspace. Anemone Projectors 19:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do pages like these count as characters?

I've noticed in fictional characters cats pages about software (example Sachiko (software)) would you count these pages for character cats?82.132.230.234 (talk) 10:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Having looked at that page, my gut feeling is no but actually I don't know. I would suggest discussing it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters (though I'm not sure how active that is recently). You could also try Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software. Anemone Projectors 11:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Anemone Projectors 22:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Anemone Projectors 22:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't known of this "A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert." Oh, well. Cebr1979 (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cebr1979: Not to worry, I won't hold it against you. I wish we could work together on this, I don't like all this bad feeling (and I'm not just saying that because you've gone to ANI). Anemone Projectors 22:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're not just saying that, you are a very polite person. However, you also won't give up regardless of how many editors have told you something. It's only your way and nothing else and you use very odd tactics to ensure that.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Lord

You have proof that that's incorrect punctuation or you just reverting at will again?Cebr1979 (talk) 09:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's incorrect punctuation because I'm a native speaker of English. The comma implies that it's the only American daytime soap opera, which I'm pretty sure it's not. Anemone Projectors 09:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually the lack of a comma that implies it's the one and only American soap opera... but, let's just leave it at that. I mean... We all know that you don't require sources for anything... You say so... therfore it is, right? You're a native speaker of English so... you're non-stop correct, all the time. Uh-huh.Cebr1979 (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Having a comma there means you can remove "One Life to Live" and it will still make grammatical sense. Then it would read "Tina Lord is a fictional character from the American daytime soap opera originally (and most notably) portrayed by Andrea Evans". It therefore implies there is only one American daytime soap opera. That sentence still require a comma betewen "opera" and "originally", therefore, there is only one comma required in the sentence. Anemone Projectors 10:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused... Am I supposed to stay off your talk page or am I supposed to respond to your nonsense after you deleted the part about staying off your talk page and then continued talking to me? It's so hard to know with you and your circles! I mean, you clearly want a response... otherwise, you wouldn't have willingly and of your free will deleted the part about me staying off your talk page, right? You even engaged in a conversation with me after that so... Oh, goodness... So confusing!Cebr1979 (talk) 10:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]