Talk:Gain–bandwidth product
Electronics Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Explanation of the Filled Parameters in the Added WikiProject Electronics Template
I added the WikiProject Electronics template since this article pertains to this WikiProject.
Class: I rated this article as a stub-class article because it has absolutely no sources. According to the WikiProject Electronics assessment page, if an article has no listed sources, it is a stub, regardless how informative, well-written, or long it is. This is simply because such articles are not verifiable, which Wikipedia holds in very high regard. Importance: The article falls we under the description of mid importance from the WikiProject Electronics assessment page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronics/Assessment).
I also added this article to the Electronics portal because I thought it was obviously befitting. --Some Old Man (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
On the Addition of {{Refimprove|article|{{subst:DATE}}|talk=y}} to the Article Page
Since the article requires sources for verification, I added the template noting in on the article page.
--Some Old Man (talk) 04:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Added graph
- Added one graph --Petteri Aimonen (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Example changed from "minimum" to "maximum"
I have changed the last example so it reads, "Further, if the <emph>maximum<emph> frequency of operation is 1 Hz, then the maximum gain that can be extracted from the device is 1 x 106" for an op-amp with a GBWP of 1 MHz (emphasis added). That is what the article used to say. On 25 August 2009, someone at IP address 132.68.50.34 changed "maximum" to "minimum." I do not believe this is correct, and no explanation was given, so I changed it back to "maximum." I would welcome a discussion if others think "minimum" is correct. -- WakingLili (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- You did good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Bogosity
I rewrote the lead since what it said was not right in general, using the 3 dB bandwidth. I added one source; it would be good to find more.
I think the theory section is also very bogus. Looks like someone's WP:OR. I think I'll remove it. Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Define everything, please!
For those people who are not electrical engineers, and for any article, please define ALL variables, constants, etc. w (omega) is frequency in radians per second, wc is cutoff frequency in radians per second etc. I think the spirit of these articles should be that a person can just read them cold, without having to already know the jargon! 71.139.173.203 (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Image
Why does the image show a low frequency roll off? Op-amps don't have that.