Jump to content

User talk:IntoThinAir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 208.54.90.142 (talk) at 14:02, 30 June 2016 (→‎TPO question: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

DYK

Hello! Your submission of William Chambliss at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The most expansive listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The most expansive. Since you had some involvement with the The most expansive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connecticut Painters

Thanks for adding Robert F Gault to the category Connecticut Painters for me. Do you know anything about the American Impressionism article? I found the talk page there very confusing. Kind of a newbie, here. Librarianhelen (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't edit painting related articles here very often, and I only categorized the Gault article because I saw it on New Pages Patrol. For this reason, I don't really know anything about the American impressionism article. Everymorning (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use The Talk Page

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Doc talk 06:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adande Thorne age

I'm so sorry for any trouble I've caused. You asked for a little more proof of his age. He stated in a few live streams that his management at the start of his career told him to stay ageless so he would provide different ages for different interviews years ago so that's why that article has him at 1980. His youtube friend Lilly Singh (SuperWoman) has also stated that the two of them are around the same age and the famous birthdays website has his bday at 1988. I tried to post the link here but its not working but you can look for yourself

Hunter20100 (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Hunter[reply]

  • You're going to need better sources than that if you want to change his DOB. The Famous Birthdays website is not a reliable source, for example, and as for the statement by SuperWoman you'd at least need to point me to the specific video where she says it. In any case, ultimately the most reliable piece of evidence that Thorne wasn't born in 1988 is this story which described him as 26 years old in 2007 (if he was born in 1988 he'd have been no older than 19). Best, Everymorning (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Garik Saribekyan

Hi,

Thanks for the review of my page "Garik Saribekyan" I have taken into account your advice, and now added references, and categories. SO it can be approved now. Please, check again if possible.

Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K.atalyants (talkcontribs) 07:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swoozie age

Sorry again. Don't mean to be a bother. Just saw your response. Well he deletes most of his live streams. He does check all of his business emails (located on his youtube page about section: Youtube.com/swoozie06) but its swooziemedia@gmail.com. He could probably be the best source because aside from his live streams, famous birthdays is the only proof I have. I'll stop updating it. I didn't know I was causing you extra work so I'm very sorry. If you have a regular email I could also reach out to him and have him email you from that email address if that helps.

Hunter20100 (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Hunter[reply]

Hi Some About My New Page Review

Hi User: Everymorning thanks for giving a suitable category to my newly created page Askmecodes, I would like to request you to have a review it again, because one of the user (User_talk:Harry_the_Dirty_Dog) put this page under Speedy deletion category. I don't understand why he did like so? I didn't put any content like promotional, I had just created my website before 2 months ago for that I want to build a brand strategy, My website will add more features in future so I will update the page time to time to make it more content reach. But for now, my site don't have too much feature so it has less content. Plz let me know If I did any violation of Wikipedia policy I will Improve the same.Saurav —Preceding undated comment added 11:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits, thank you

Hello there. I sent you an email in regards to a cite error that you may be able to help rectify.

I appreciate your time.

Kind regards.

Districtmemberboard (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Districtmemberboard[reply]

NPP / AfC

Hi. Just a reminder that in just over a week at Wikimania there's going to be a cross-Wiki discussion about the systems of control of new pages. This is a round-table rather than a presentation or a lecture. On the agenda are reforms to the new article reviewing systems and ways to help new users better understand our content policies. If you are going to Italy and would like to take part, please check out the conference schedule, and I look forward to seeing you there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, but unfortunately, I won't be there as I am busy taking a class for the rest of this month and a bit of the next one. Everymorning (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Path to citizenship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MWH Page Edits

Hey, I'm Rhythmofyouth. When I edited the Men Without Hats page I added a nickname for Ivan. The nickname was never given to him (at least I have never heard of that happening). Anyway, I gave him a nickname because I am a fan of Men Without Hats. I was only trying to get the nickname out there. Maybe, he would like it. I wasn't trying to cause any trouble. So, no, I do not have a source because I thought of it on my own. I would like to add it in so that maybe he (and others) could see it. I know that it would be misguiding to those who are not familiar to the band, but maybe I could start it off. Thank you for your time. Rhythmofyouth (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 Calabasas fire

The article 2016 Calabasas fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not a notable fire. By convention only fires over 1,000 acres are included, or fires with notable structure loss or loss of life. This fire meets none of those.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blow Your Head: Diplo Presents Dubstep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TPO question

Maybe you should repost this? It's tiresome watching Jimmy Wales hide from anything controversial that he's ever involved in. Tiresome because it's so frequent and predictable! - 208.54.90.142 (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]