User talk:Sarojupreti

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 18:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 09:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal

Hello Sir, I am Sarojupreti. Everybody thought that i am here to damage wikipedia. But Actually i am not here to damage wikipedia. I am here to contribute and become good editor. I will tell you history of mine in wikipedia. I had registered here on February 2016. At that i am unknown about wikipedia and i created next account sarojupreti132 thinking i haven't created account. But i knew that i had already created account. And after some days i was blocked by you. I had also request unblock appeal for two times but that was denined by administarator. So, please help me by unblocking my original account. I willn't harm wikipedia but i will contribute more to make it better. So Please unblock Sarojupreti and give me one chance. Ian.thomson Ayub407 McGeddon Adog104 Cordless Larry Mike V C.Fred David Biddulph SpacemanSpiff BU Rob13 me_and Vanjagenije Ponyo Cyphoidbomb Constanstin Boing! said Zebedee Thanks!! Saroj Upreti 00:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Auto Unblock Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarojupreti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir, I am Sarojupreti. Everybody thought that i am here to damage wikipedia. But Actually i am not here to damage wikipedia. I am here to contribute and become good editor. I will tell you history of mine in wikipedia. I had registered here on February 2016. At that i am unknown about wikipedia and i created next account sarojupreti132 thinking i haven't created account. But i knew that i had already created account. And after some days i was blocked by you. I had also request unblock appeal for two times but that was denined by administarator. So, please help me by unblocking my original account. I willn't harm wikipedia but i will contribute more to make it better. So Please unblock Sarojupreti and give me one chance. Thanks!!

Decline reason:

Given that you've create a few dozen accounts, you're going to need a more compelling explanation that that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

OhNoitsJamie that's all account are not mine. some accounts are of Beebek Bhurtel who is my friend. I have only 3/4 accounts. What should I do to be unblocked? Please help me??? I want to edit more articles and help wikipedia. Saroj Upreti 02:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian.thomson, Ayub407, McGeddon, Cordless Larry, Mike V, C.Fred, David Biddulph, SpacemanSpiff, BU Rob13, Me and, Vanjagenije, Ponyo, Cyphoidbomb, Constanstin, and Boing! said Zebedee: I didn't get a ping from the Unblock Appeal, and I'm assuming the rest of the users on the list didn't either, so pinging all again if any one has any further comments. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 02:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First off, quit creating accounts. The more accounts you create, the less willing anyone will be to unblock you. Then wait at least six months without creating any more accounts, and use the unblock template (given above) again, explaining how you'll avoid doing the stuff that got you blocked to begin with (and promising not to create any more accounts). Don't blame anyone else in your unblock request. That's the standard offer. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian.thomson, Ayub407, McGeddon, Cordless Larry, Mike V, C.Fred, David Biddulph, SpacemanSpiff, BU Rob13, Me and, Vanjagenije, Ponyo, Cyphoidbomb, Constanstin, and Boing! said Zebedee: You have said don't blame others but why are you keeping others accounts in my socks. don't you know how to identify users. users like beebek62,nepali keto62, Beebekbhurtel5 RedRose64, Bibekbhurtel,etc are not my accounts. then why are u keeping them in my sock.

I can't wait for 6 months. Please unblock now as I have created only 11 accounts but you have listed 22 account in my socks. what iz this?? Can u answer??

Saroj Upreti 02:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Saroj Upreti, Yes i'm answering you. Read my message carefully. Do not ignore. Tell me, you told me (on the User talk:Nepali keto62) that sarojupreti is not you account, and i trusted you thinking you as an innocent guy, and now i'm seeing what? Now it's conformed that you're really socking (also lying).
And i'm giving you two offers (1). Wait only 5 or 6 months and unblock your account.(2). Create more accounts and loose your trust...
Follow these tips to be unblocked.

Do not create another account.
Wait at least 5 or 6 months.
Contribute to Simple english wikipedia or nepali wikipedia for 6 months time passing.
Do not make much unblock requests, because any admin can change your block settings and then you're not able to edit your talk page.
Make unblock request in December, when there is cold and snow outside.
Read my this message and think deeply.
I know you're in good faith.

Thanks, my friend—Constanstin 06:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July

@Bbb23: Sir, You are not doing fair manner to me. you are keeping accounts on my socks which are not mine and you are not also replying and blocking me. why are doing these all to me?? answer me??? Saroj Upreti 02:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Please unblock me sir and transfer accounts of my socks to beebek bhurtel socks. I will tell his socks. He is my friend. If he was my socks then his name will be saroj but he keep his name 4 times in 4 different accounts. so please unblock me. Saroj Upreti 02:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarojupreti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me

Decline reason:

You don't get to decide your unblock. YOu've been warned enough times on your various socks. Stay away for six months without any new socks and an unblock may be considered. —SpacemanSpiff 02:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First, the notification won't go through if you don't use new tildes to sign your comment. Second, with all of what I'm seeing with the multiple accounts confirmed by checkuser in SPI which can be found here and here, I would take the word of Ian+Spaceman and take a break before requesting an unblock again. Please take the WP:OFFER.
Thirdly, on another note, pinging other users doesn't mean they will respond or see the ping ASAP. A lot of us are on different timezones... Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 03:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Adog104: I am trying to follow all the rules but one person is creating users rapidly and it will comes in my sockpuppet. Please make his new sockpuppet users and transfer his all account to that sockpuppet. So Please help me to get rid of this problem. Please help me. I will tell his account list. Please help me.

His accounts are:-

Beebek accounts list

Somebody Is Blaming Me

Hello Sir, I am trying to follow all instructions but Beebek Bhurtel is making new accounts as being my sock. Please remove his accounts from my sockpuppet users. He may make new users and it will violate me. So, Please help me by making me far away from and moving his accounts to another sockpuppet.. Saroj Upreti 16:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]