User talk:Mx. Granger

Accidental reverte

I accidentally rolled back one of your edits. I didn't mean to and actually wanted to thank you for the edit. I have self reverted. Editor2020 (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Tania Marmolejo

Dear Mr. Granger, I'm an author and art critic working in the edition of a prominent artist. I have authorization to use the images that I am uploading and the text, that was written by me, by the way. Also, on eof the links the bot has removed is a well know art magazine Irreversible based in Miami, Florida. And I don't really understand why is in your black list of sites. While you are using a robot to check my edition, there is a human being in this side of the network trying to contribute and facing a lot of frustration every time i publish a change and receive a wrong filter message I would appreciate very much your help in this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RabbiBragi (talk • contribs) 01:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi RabbiBragi. Let me address the issues one by one.

First, the link addition that was reverted by the User:XLinkBot. If the link satisfies WP:External links, you can re-add it, as XLinkBot indicated on your user talk page.

Second, the text of the article, which appears to be mostly copied from [1] or another external site. If you really are the copyright holder and you are willing to release the text under Wikipedia's licenses, please indicate this by following the instructions at WP:DONATETEXT.

Third, the image. If the copyright holder is willing to release it under a license acceptable for Wikimedia Commons, you can indicate this by following the instructions at Commons:OTRS or using the form here.

Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion template from the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. —Granger (talk · contribs) 01:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claude Wilfrid Etoka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercuria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 11:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jane Austen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jane Austen. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Turkish military intervention in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Turkish military intervention in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Request about the User:MehrdadFR

Hello.

The User:MehrdadFR (talk) reverted your neutral edition in the article Hijab by country, because he is constantly reverting neutral and third party information and sources about the hijab in Iran, and is almost exclusively using POV (that is pro-government) language about the hijab in Iran (that may contradict academic sources which have no internet links) and is relying on sources based in Iran that naturally favor the Iranian policy on the hijab (and not on all third party and acedmic sources), as you can see in the Iran section of that article as well as in the Women in Iran article. He uses weasel words (that are commonly used by Iranian government sources) such as "the official reveiling in 1984" in both articles about the mandatory hijab for women. I reverted his reverts and clarified the sentences. Could you check this user and warn him about his use of POV and almost the expropriation of this subject? As I can see from this user's talk page, he also has a history of edit warring with other users in various articles, and has received warnings.

Thank you.

SednaXV (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)