User talk:Yamla

What if I make this a section?

Thank you for your help, and actually paying attention. User:leighroy4 —Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

67.244.58.187

Pleese unblock me! I have not been Vandelizing lately. 67.244.58.187 (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2015 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipadguy (talk • contribs)

This is incorrect. Furthermore, I am extending the block on Paleontologist99 to indefinite, as it is clear you have no intention of ever following Wikipedia rules and policies, even after promising repeatedly to do so. --Yamla (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

umm YOU are getting out of hand Yamla and i don't Believe you that you get email from Famous people!!!! i think YOU are lie. i don't think YOU are doing your job right!! why you are extending the block yes i get it but why??? YOU are just mean. you are just like " the grinch" 71.11.116.64

Sign, so the archive bot can archive this section. --Yamla (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Juanacho Block

Hey, I need your help. Juanacho is messing up some pages by deleting some sources and necessary elements. I want her/him to be blocked again with your help since you have done that before...I guess. Please do reply soon. I want Wikipedia to be a resourceful place but he/she is ruining it. Kikkokalabud (talk)

Brexx

Hi Yalma, this is Brexx, you blocked me way back in 2008, and ok, yes before i deserved it, because i wasn't very familiar with the rules of wikipedia…but now im different …i total changed….I pledge to not put anything that i didn't personally write and not upload images or other media that are not entirely my own work. I understand that copyrighted material should not be put in wikipedia and that there will be consequences if users don't follow the rules of wikipedia and of the law. Anyone who wishes to edit wikipedia should follow their rules and take them seriously.

I have read the relevant policy pages on Wikipedia and some Wikipedia articles on the subject of copyright, i read the Wikipedia:Copyrights and the Wikipedia:Copyright violations articles several times and understand them completely. Wikipedia is very dear to my heart and now i fully comply with the rules of copyright and the rules of wikipedia and i will only assume good faith…….if you see all my edits from all my recent accounts, you will see that all im doing is adding reliable information with reliable sources…….please, i don't want to keep going from account to account…i want stability……ill do anything….i admit i should not have created all these new accounts, but what's done is done, and im begging for forgiveness and closure………if your still spectical, you can unblock me and have someone monitor my edits, im more than ok with that because i know that im now editing in good faith and adding reliable information with relialbe sources…..please open a discussion about unblocking me here and see what other admins think: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN

side note about my brexx account: I forgot my Brexx password and the e-mail i registered when i created the account got deleted because i did not use it for a long time, , so i cant recover my wikipedia password, so i can't use the brexx account anymore...everytime i create a new account, i get blocked.....

Thank you, Yamla!

Much obliged for terminating the collateral damage! I have to tell you that, despite my annoyance, I've gotten a huge laugh out of this--these guys are the rudest possible tenants of an office building with a shared common area, but to think that on top of leaving ramen noodles in the sink drain for others to clean up, they SPAM WIKIPEDIA!? and GET ME AUTOBLOCKED!? You couldn't pay a Hollywood writer to dream that up for some sitcom. I appreciate your good faith very much! -

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Yamla. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your conduct with Wikipedia Sovereign and protecting Trump-related articles from being bombarded by his disruptive editing. Darth Tacker (talk) 01:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

{{unblock-auto reviewed}} nit

I assumed you didn't actually want 127.0.0.1 reported, so I changed parameter 1. Not sure why that parameter is mandatory and doesn't default to the IP of the page to which it's posted. DMacks (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah. I didn't want that. If you go to the revision before I declined the unblock, you'll see that this is the default when you show the 'Administrator use only' section. Now, normally, we don't even have the IP address available on an unblock-auto review. In this case, we obviously did. I wonder why it defaults to 127.0.0.1. Any thoughts? --Yamla (talk) 20:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah but my page was a user page if you want me to remove the logos you could have simply warned meRoger Delacroix (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)