Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Madsalty (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 21 October 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Noticeboard


Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.

Notifying TRM

I just filed a case request against The Rambling Man. However, I can't notify him on his talk page because he banned me from it some time ago. Can a clerk do it please? Thanks. Banedon (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done [1] Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 05:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying other editors who encountered TRM

There must be other editors who had experiences with TRM. Since neither Banedon nor I can "canvass", perhaps clerks can notify those who may be not aware of the case request. George Ho (talk) 21:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

George Ho this isn't a "gang up on TRM" session. There is no need to notify everyone who has had any sort of interaction, positive or negative, with him in the past. Drop the stick. Let it go. I don't know how much clearer I can make this. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man

Clerks, apologies made a complete mess upof my statement in this case. will try to correct. If I cannot all assistance appriciated.Edmund Patrick confer 08:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

done I believe, thanks Edmund Patrick confer 08:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing my statements

I condensed and eliminated my statements to around 600-650 words. Is this acceptable, or more should be condensed? --George Ho (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Esoglou, now indef banned, made probably a motion or request at the case about Christianity and sexuality. However, he put it under Proposals. I moved it to the very bottom because he didn't make a proposal. Rather it looked like a motion or request, so it should be moved to the very top, "Motions and requests by the parties". George Ho (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to make any changes to that page since that case closed 18 months ago. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my Edits

I would like some clarification when it comes to a specific user insisting on reverting my edits. [[2]] & [[3]] (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]