Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks
Noticeboard
Clerks' Noticeboard
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b) | none | none | 26 July 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
Private matters
The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
Procedures
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
- Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
Notifying TRM
I just filed a case request against The Rambling Man. However, I can't notify him on his talk page because he banned me from it some time ago. Can a clerk do it please? Thanks. Banedon (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Notifying other editors who encountered TRM
There must be other editors who had experiences with TRM. Since neither Banedon nor I can "canvass", perhaps clerks can notify those who may be not aware of the case request. George Ho (talk) 21:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- George Ho this isn't a "gang up on TRM" session. There is no need to notify everyone who has had any sort of interaction, positive or negative, with him in the past. Drop the stick. Let it go. I don't know how much clearer I can make this. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
The Rambling Man
Clerks, apologies made a complete mess upof my statement in this case. will try to correct. If I cannot all assistance appriciated.Edmund Patrick – confer 08:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- done I believe, thanks Edmund Patrick – confer 08:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Editing my statements
I condensed and eliminated my statements to around 600-650 words. Is this acceptable, or more should be condensed? --George Ho (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Esoglou, now indef banned, made probably a motion or request at the case about Christianity and sexuality. However, he put it under Proposals. I moved it to the very bottom because he didn't make a proposal. Rather it looked like a motion or request, so it should be moved to the very top, "Motions and requests by the parties". George Ho (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- There is no reason to make any changes to that page since that case closed 18 months ago. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Reverting my Edits
I would like some clarification when it comes to a specific user insisting on reverting my edits. [[2]] & [[3]] (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)