Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conflicts of interest of President-elect Donald Trump

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a very WP:POV, WP:UNDUE piece, which also has elements of WP:COATRACK. I highly suggest a merge to a more appropriate Trump article if there is one. Parsley Man (talk) 05:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with nom; this is heavily WP:POV and WP:UNDUE. Some of the topics in this article deserve coverage somewhere on Wikipedia, but building a list of every possible conflict of interest Trump might arguably have just comes across as an attack. -IagoQnsi (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete smear piece.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure - if we're going on the usual standards of notability, then this topic seems to be fairly well covered in the media. [1] [2] etc. JMWt (talk) 11:59, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is well covered by many reliable news sources - not POV or UNDUE because it's an unprecedented situation, which is what the news outlets are covering.. Victor Grigas (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: Victorgrigas (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Parsley Man (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Certainly an important topic, and notable. However WP:NPOV and WP:BLP seem to be against this presentation of the issues. Especially when we get into things like the Bank of China renting office space in a Trump building. Is there an article on the Trump transition process where this could be a section? Note that there are no conflicts of interest yet, only that some people have raised concerns there might be when he becomes president.Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be titled "Potential conflicts of interest..." Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would change the title but that might be seen as a conflict of interest on my part. :-) Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]