User talk:ONUnicorn
Hello. Feel free to leave me a message.
Nice 3rd Opinion
Hi ONUnicorn! I want to thank you for writing the great third opinion at Talk:Charun. Reading all of that stuff is something in itself, nevermind doing what you did! See you around. —Mets501 (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
72.153.107.51
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. ST47 20:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- (posted to ST47's talk page) Sorry. I usually do subst the templates. I must have just forgot that time. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 20:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
So where does it end?
I don't want to break the 3RR rule, but Igor on PocketPC is not giving up. Where does it go from here? Timeshift 23:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cheers for that. You've now given Igor the impression he has correct evidence when he does not, and has begun to start adding his nonsense again. Again, cheers. Timeshift 16:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- We have. In great length. We have exhausted all forms of communication as far as I can see. I have repeated myself many times and find myself getting nowhere. I am at a loss for what else to say to him. I can barely get an understandable response out of him as it is. Timeshift 16:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps read his last contribution to the discussion page. How am I supposed to reason with that? Whatever he's on, I want some... Timeshift 04:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- We have. In great length. We have exhausted all forms of communication as far as I can see. I have repeated myself many times and find myself getting nowhere. I am at a loss for what else to say to him. I can barely get an understandable response out of him as it is. Timeshift 16:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Please Vote on this discussion
I see you are quite an active editor. I have been discussing with another editor whether or not my company qualifies under WP:CORP We feel that it does under the first point. The other editor keeps bringing up things that are not in the rules outlined under WP:CORP Please comment on this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enigma_software_group
thank you,
EnigmaSoftwareGroup