Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JJMC89 bot 8

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

JJMC89 bot 8

Operator: JJMC89 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 10:52, Saturday, January 21, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: replace.py on GitHub

Function overview: Replace {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}}|{{{1}}} with {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}} in taxonomy templates.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ#Tidy taxonomy templates (permalink)

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: Up to 19,772

Exclusion compliant: Yes

Already has a bot flag: Yes

Function details: Replace {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}}|{{{1}}} with {{Don't edit this line {{{machine code|}}} in taxonomy templates.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. 49 edits and skipped {{Taxonomy/Acacia}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for extended trial (250 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Please do one more batch to give anyone time to complain if they see any problems. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. 250 edits — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux and JJMC89: as the trial was completely successful (I monitor the taxobox error tracking categories and nothing appeared), could this be completed now? Peter coxhead (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Task approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.