User talk:Fuadorko2

Sierra Leone

Please cite a source from Sierra Leone government, Indian media won't do. Materialscientist (talk) 22:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Sierra Leone government has little online presense. You probably won't be able to find a source saying even Sierra Leone native languages on their government website.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that you may not edit-war even if you are right, and you have no business calling other editors racists simply because they demand that you back up your assertions. Acroterion (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only called him racist AFTER I had already backup up my assertions with reputable sources. Also how come HE isn't warned about edit warring? He started it, because HE is the one who kept undoing my changes first even though I had reputable sources.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fuadorko2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only called him racist AFTER I had already backup up my assertions with reputable sources. Also how come HE isn't warned about edit warring? He started it, because HE is the one who kept undoing my changes first even though I had reputable sources.

Decline reason:

Wow, "he started it" didn't work when I was 5 and my brother was 8; I'm amazed anyone old enough to know how to type thinks it's an acceptable excuse for bad behavior. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you feel it's OK to call someone a racist because they disagree with you? And to continue to edit-war after a warning? Acroterion (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Fuadorko2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok but you didnt answer why the other person undoing my edits wasnt blocked, why was I blocked but not him? It takes 2 to edit war.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=ok but you didnt answer why the other person undoing my edits wasnt blocked, why was I blocked but not him? It takes 2 to edit war. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=ok but you didnt answer why the other person undoing my edits wasnt blocked, why was I blocked but not him? It takes 2 to edit war. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=ok but you didnt answer why the other person undoing my edits wasnt blocked, why was I blocked but not him? It takes 2 to edit war. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You were blocked primarily for making offensive comments about other editors. Acroterion (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well he was being offensive to me by denying that my language is official in Sierra Leone. I take pride in my language and he offended me.