Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elonka Dunin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Johnyajohn (talk | contribs) at 05:01, 26 September 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is just self promotion and free advertising! This article and page does not belong here!


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination). When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was Keep. This appears to not have been closed completely but the talk pages carries a notation that it was closed 12 december 2005 with a result of keep --++Lar: t/c 03:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur Wikipedian with an article. Does he belong on Wikipedia:Wikipedians_with_articles ? If not, then I think that the page should be deleted. He can describe himself on his User: page. Fplay 06:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted for lacking input. Johnleemk | Talk 16:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was advised to create the page since I was already mentioned in several other wikipedia articles. I have added links to those articles, as well as other biographical information to the page. -- Elonka 10:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:AUTO? - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 10:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I should also point out that I did not create the page. It was created by Zippy, one of the Wikipedia admins, who encouraged me to add the information. -- Elonka 11:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you use the Talk page to suggest mods. Even Jimbo can't get away with editing his own article :-) - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:50, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's guidance, not policy. If you have questions about the factuality of the article, that is best discussed on the article's talk page. If you have questions about the notability of the person described, see below. --Zippy 23:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]