User talk:Beatley

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Women in Red online editathon on sports

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathon. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Sports"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michèle Audette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michèle Audette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michèle Audette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dana Cranston) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dana Cranston, Beatley!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

In the future, please add detail to your references instead of just including links.

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dalina Bocour) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dalina Bocour, Beatley!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

In the future, do not include a colon before Categories. Use [[Category:Example]] instead of [[:Category:Example]]

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danica Uljević for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danica Uljević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danica Uljević until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I guess it was a bad idea to unblock you, since you continue doing exactly the same for what you have been blocked before. At least npw your unblock request will be reviewed by another administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

you need to apologize for your bad block. apparently the articles nominated for deletion were kept as "no consensus" you do not have a consensus for the actions you are taking. you are so incompetent, i will make an example out of you. Beatley (talk) 20:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]