Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Swarthmore/East European Prose (Spring 2017)

This Course

Wikipedia Resources

Interactive training

Editing guidelines (PDF)

Help pages (PDF)

More resources

Connect

Other courses

Questions? Ask us:

contactwikiedu.org

Course name: East European Prose

Institution: Swarthmore

Instructor: Sibelan Forrester

Wikipedia Expert: Shalor (Wiki Ed)

Subject: Russian

Course dates: 2017-01-17 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-08-31 23:59:59 UTC

Approximate number of student editors: 7

Student	Assigned	Reviewing
Mmancin2	Elegy for Kosovo, The Return of Philip Latinowicz, Magda Szabó
Smcgrew1	Professor Martens' Departure, Danilo Kiš, The Door (novel)
Nbronkema	Gimme the Money, Freud's Sister
Ktan2
Max Rogow	Albanian Epic Verse, Poetry, and Song, Milica Mićić Dimovska
Kpruitt1	Garden, Ashes, Danilo Kiš, Early Sorrows
Emogave1

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

Assignment - Set up your accounts & evaluate Wikipedia

Get set up

Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
Take all the assigned trainings below.
Review:
- Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
- Evaluating Wikipedia
- Page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook

Evaluate Wikipedia

Read the following Wikipedia articles:
Prose
The list of Western Literature articles and specifically one of the East European countries listed there.
One of
One of
While you read, consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Check the "talk" page - what conversation is the Wikipedia community having behind the scenes about how to represent these topics?
- Is the article locked? What is the article rated?
Take notes in your sandbox about what you've learned during this process.
Optional: Choose at least 1 questions relevant to one of the articles you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Max Rogow (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC). [reply]

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

In class - Wednesday Discussion: What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources

Over the break you were asked to look up a few topics on Wikipedia that you wanted to work on. This week, finalize your topic and on the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself. If you still haven't picked a topic, check out the list of "available articles" on the Articles tab above and assign yourself one from there.
In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
- Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
- Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
- If you choose to update or create a biography of an author, check out the Editing Wikipedia articles on Biographies handout.

Week 3

Course meetings

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

In class - Wednesday Discussion: Thinking about sources and plagiarism

Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Assignment - Copyedit & draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Copyedit
Read through it, thinking about ways to improve the language, such as fixing grammatical mistakes. Then, make the appropriate changes.

Creating a new article?

Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
- A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.

Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Assignment - If you want to translate an article

To start:

Take the necessary assigned training modules.
Copy your article from the target-language Wikipedia into your sandbox.
Begin to translate your work.
Introduce citations from English-language texts or other language texts that support the facts stated in your translated article. Adjust your translation if necessary.
For each sentence you translate, make a note of the sources used in the original article. Are they good sources? Do they really say what the Wikipedia article describes?

When you're ready to move your work live:

Move your sandbox draft into main space.
- If you are expanding an existing article, it's time to add your revised translation (including English sources, when available). Copy your edit into the article. If you are making many small edits, save after each edit before you make the next one. Do NOT paste over the entire existing article, or large sections of the existing article. Be sure to check the article's talk page and respond to suggestions from Wikipedians. Don't panic if your edits are removed or changed! Discuss it civilly on the article's talk page, and make a note of it for your report or presentation about your editing experience.
- If you are creating a new article, do NOT copy and paste your text, or there will be no record of your work history. Follow instruction on the "Moving out of your sandbox" handout.
In your first edit to the article namespace, include a link of the source article (i.e., the article you translated) in the "edit summary" before hitting "save."
Copy the code to the bottom of the Wikipedia article, replacing es with the language code of the language you a translating from and replacing Page Title with the title of the source page.

Handout: Moving out of your sandbox

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 4

Course meetings

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

In class - Wednesday Discussion: Thinking about Wikipedia

What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?

Assignment - Peer review and copy edit

By Friday April 7th you should have a draft ready for peer review. Peer review notes are due to your fellow students by April 12th.

First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column.
Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?

Week 5

Course meetings

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

Assignment - Respond to peer review & start moving live!

Respond to peer review
You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Move your work live
Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?

Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 6

Course meetings

Wednesday, 19 April 2017

Assignment - Finish improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 7

Course meetings

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

Assignment - Reflective essay

Due April 26th.

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.