User talk:Reddogsix
S e m i - R e t i r e d
Please put new entries at the BOTTOM OF THE PAGE
Sergio Lamensa
Irvicelli (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)It is a translation of the Spanish version: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Lamensa. In addition, Sergio Lamensa brushed celebrities and models, that is relevant for the curious user on fashionIrvicelli (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Deletion of Page: Daisy Data
Hi. My page was just deleted. I was writing about a company to explain first the history of the business, since it was established by an immigrant who had a significant historical impact of the Israeli weapons development. I wanted then delve into the niche business, explaining how the rugged computer manufacturing business works and how it operates today.
Additionally, there are much larger companies that have their history and production process described here on Wikipedia - companies that we work with regularly. I am curious why Wikipedia allows a large company to have a presence but not a small business whose story should inspire people to take risks to follow their passion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaisyDataDisplays (talk • contribs) 20:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Weymann Guitars
Hey Reddogsix, thanks a lot for helping clean up my article & get it going. I really appreciate your help. I hope to upload some photos I have (personally) of the old original labels & literature. I just received a piece of paperwork, an original invoice from 1899. Would be really cool to input in the page.
As I was attempting to clean up the citation (adding the correct dates by simply clicking the box - didn't know it was that easy) -- it appears you had already done that. Thank you so very much. I suppose the analogy.. You're teaching a kid - some table manners, in which I appreciate!
You missed Billsimmons7. Also, they are not "banned" but "blocked" and they are not "users" because there's only one person operating them. Take care.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've updated the comment.
Carlo DeMaria, Jr.
Clearly I do not know what is considered copyright and what is not, and I will stop adding copyrighted images to my article. However, I am trying to further develop this page and I would appreciate it if you would stop meddling with my edits and adding sections, and also putting my page up for deletion. There is no reason for the page to be deleted, as so far it is a sourced article about a living person. I will work on getting better pictures.
Carlo
I am allowed to remove the articles for deletion notice, as that is what wikipedia gave me as a notice. Therefore, I will continue to delete it as I do not want it on my page. The discussion will take place, but according to wikipedia it does not need to be visible on top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soxfan0902 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you think you can removed AfDs from articles. You are not allowed to do so without accepting the consequence of your actions. reddogsix (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Deletion of page Tony A Molina
Your comment regarding the article is understood. If I decide to rewrite the article I will make sure to provide more detail and better references.
Thanks Molingrad (talk) 21:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Revert
Hey, sorry about that revert on Michael Hawton, I accidentally clicked revert on my smartphone, I actually tried to undo my edit but you undid it first. (Just letting you know) XboxGamer22408talk to me 04:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Have a great day/night. reddogsix (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
I am the author of the TruDog or TRU article you proposed for deletion on the grounds that no citations were present. I have since provided 6 (six) citations. I sincerely hope this addition will contribute to the case in defense of my article and will serve as evidence against its deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbauer18 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Proposed Deletion of Leonard Logsdail
Hi Reddogsix. I am the author of Leonard Logsdail that you proposed for deletion. I have since added non-trivial sources (including The New York Times) and greater detail on the biography of Leonard Logsdail. I hope this is considered sufficient grounds for removal of the proposed deletion. Please let me know if you would like to see more of a defense in any way. Regards, deanhdewey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deanhdewey (talk • contribs) 17:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from JD Harmon, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Penedo
Ha! I edit conflicted with you and was making exactly the same edit as this. - Sitush (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
On the other hand, your actions in this thread are awful. Please don't do that again. - Sitush (talk) 01:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Sitush - </sigh> What is really awful is your jumping to conclusion the action was punitive. If you understood copyright issues and how they apply to Wikipedia articles you would understand the reasoning behind the CSD. There is nothing that prohibits applying a CSD while an article is at AfD, particularly in the case of copyright violations. Bottom line is a copyright violation is just that and copied material is not allowed in Wikipedia. Under the same circumstances, I would do exactly the same same as I did. I would suggest you look in the mirror when it comes to WP:AGF. reddogsix (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- I understand copyright issues far better than you seem to think - try checking my contribution history over the last 10 years or so and you'll see loads of examples because the Indic topic area is rife with people who copy/paste etc. The point is, an explanation for the copying of stuff they'd written elsewhere had already been given and there are umpteen experienced contributors involved in that AfD who accepted it. Effectively, you were tagging against the consensus that it is a non-issue. This is already an unpleasant experience for OlgaWills2017 and there is no need to make it any worse.
- Furthermore, since a CSD, once removed, even without good cause, cannot be reinstated, there was little chance of any gain from tagging it as such: it just piles on the agony. What you could have done with greater effect is blank the page and apply the copyright investigation tag. But since that process takes more than a week, there most likely isn't much to gain by that, either. It should be obvious that the article is going to be deleted anyway. - Sitush (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- </sigh> X2...An explanation of why something is a copy of something is not an absolution of copyright issues. It is akin to those editors that think they can reference original text and use it in an article. Let's not even bring up how we could up to that point even determine if it was really the editor's work. Again, a copyright violation is just that and copied material is not allowed in Wikipedia. This is regardless of how many or few editors decide to ignore the issue. When, the article was marked with the CSD the originating text was marked, "All rights reserved." I fail to see how this meets Wikipedia criteria for allowable text.
- "...since a CSD, once removed, even without good cause, cannot be reinstated," this is a new one on me. Where does it say one cannot reinstate a CSD? This may apply to PRODS, but not CSDs. Given the fact that a copyright vio tag had never been applied to the page, I am even more confused with your analysis of the CSD.
- As far as the copyright investigation, I had considered that, but thought that it would be even more disruptive to the user than a CSD. reddogsix (talk) 15:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Shaun Jose Rodrigues
I've declined your CSD tags on Shaun Jose Rodrigues. The claim of significant inventions constitutes a credible claim of significance and there is no promotional text in the current version of the article. ~ Rob13Talk 22:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Greg Johnson (white nationalist)
I don't feel strongly about this article's fate, but Greg is considered one of the seniormost members of the New Right/Alt-Right, as the SPLC citation mentions. He's also had well-known people like Kevin B. MacDonald and Tito Perdue write forwards for him. I'll leave it up to you. Franzboas (talk) 02:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump revelation of classified information to Russia
The discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump revelation of classified information to Russia is clearly going to keep. Will you withdraw the nom so we can get this closed?Casprings (talk) 01:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Eian Beron Page
New to Wikipedia contributions. Trying to add any information or mentions of the subject from reliable sources. If the references do not support the point made in the article, is it not our job to modify the article instead of removing references? Our job is to contribute anything that might add to the notability. Not sure why you are going against that. Also, Wikipedia says you can delete the notice if you disagree with it, and that it will not be re-added once deleted. But you re-added it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by AppleFan2007 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- @AppleFan2007 - You are new to Wikipedia, in order for an article to be included in Wikipedia it needs to establish notability. The only way to show that is to provide referential support for the statements in the article - something you have failed to do. Notability is not established by making unsupported statements, it is established by providing support for the article. In addition, unsupported statements can be removed at any time. reddogsix (talk) 04:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Didn't mean to delete deletion article, was trying to undo an earlier change.
S e m i - R e t i r e d