Jump to content

User:AristonAstuanax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AristonAstuanax (talk | contribs) at 04:13, 28 September 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:User beer


Template:User Belgian beer


(Remember kids, it's not drinking, it's research!)

This user plays the cello.
orchThis user plays in an orchestra.
This user appreciates progressive rock.
This user enjoys
heavy metal music.
This user is an undergraduate student majoring in Philosophy and minoring in Music.
This user studies at the University of Tulsa.
OPThis user studies at, or is an alumnus of, a Dominican Order school.
Oxon.This user is an Oxonian.

Template:User Christian Template:User Cyrl Template:User Grek

el-2Αυτός ο χρήστης μπορεί να συνεισφέρει σε μεσαίου επιπέδου ελληνικά.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
SoE-5This fine gentleman, or if so permitted this proper Southern belle, is a genuine pro-fessional eloquent speaker of our delightful Southern English.
ru-1Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.

Template:User bored reasons








  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.