Talk:Pushyabhuti dynasty
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pushyabhuti dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
India Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Merge
I propose to merge Empire of Harsha into this page since it's about the empire of one of the kings of this dynasty. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 22:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Merge with suitable copyedit and rearrangement of text. Covers the same topic.--Nizil (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Capankajsmilyo: It is a reasonable proposal. Both are short, the dynasty would benefit from greater depth, and the empire material would benefit from greater context. Is there an advantage to merging to the dynasty rather than merging to the ruler Harsha? --Worldbruce (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's a good option too Worldbruce -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
I propose against the merging of 'Pushtyabhuti dynasty' page with 'Empire of Harsha' page.
202.41.10.3 (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Because 'Pushtyabhuti dynasty' page talks about the dynasty while 'Empire of Harsha' page gives details about a great ruler. He is a very important ruler so he needs to be discussed in a separate page. Though I propose to merge 'Empire of Harsha' page with 'Harsha' page because both page talks about same person. 202.41.10.3 (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Ratan Singh