Jump to content

Talk:China and the International Monetary Fund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jseo1 (talk | contribs) at 00:54, 10 June 2017 (Update POLI144D IPE - Money assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconChina Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wbohaitan (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Akhall. --Akhall (talk) 05:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Akhall Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Yes- great sources, needs 1 additional.[reply]

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes

Is there anything that distracted you? •Is the article neutral with neutral sources? Article is neutral

Do the citation links work? Yes

Is there plagiarism in the article? No

Is any information out of date? No — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akhall (talkcontribs) 04:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3 Constructive Suggestions: 1) == Needs 1 additional source ==

Very good; needs 1 more source to meet class requirements. Akhall (talk) 02:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC) Akhall (talk)Akhall[reply]

2) Perhaps add how the SDR affects the overall voting rights.

3) No other suggestions.



ChiluuginT (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)ChiluuginT[reply]

  1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? All the sources are reliable, from IMF or from peer-reviewed presses
  2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes
  3. Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it's neutral
  4. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, it's neutral
  5. Do the citation links work? Yes
  6. Is there plagiarism in the article? No
  7. Is any information out of date? No
  8. Is anything missing that could be added? No