User talk:Yashovardhan Dhanania

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

16:23:58, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Scholarinchief

• Scholarinchief (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Man Who Knew: The Life and Times of Alan Greenspan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

Not sure what the problem is here? I have cited reviews in the Economist, the Financial Times, and the New York Times? These are real reviews, not mentions. Could you please clarify the issue?

Thanks!

Recent Review of Zebronics

Hi yashovardhan Dhanania, Thanks for your recent review on Zebronics. I have noted all the points you mentioned, but its little confusing what you talk about. All the links included passes the notability, if you want to help me in removing it i am more than happy of it.I have reedited the content and i wish expereinced people like you needs to contribute to indian wiki projects. Thank You --- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shusilence (talk • contribs) 10:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Chera dynasty

You didn't include the code. Template:Ds/talk notice. Doug Weller talk 19:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: I think I did include the topic code (ipa)... Are you talking about something else I missed or didI screw up something? Yashovardhan (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Damn, I'm an Arb and I forgot which link that was concealed behind. You're ok, the template isn't. Doug Weller talk 19:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Damn! Even I had to figure out which link It's there in for the first time I used it! I think a clear cut link like"permitted here .." Or something like that would work way better. That'll be a lot of effort though... Good luck.... Keep forgetting. I meant keep working! Yashovardhan (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I've asked that it make the pages explicit. Doug Weller talk 20:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

• News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)

• In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill

• Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take

• Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues

• Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth

• Recent research: Utopian bubbles: Can Wikipedians create value outside of the capitalist system?

• Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Question about Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard

Hi, thank you for paying attention to my file. Can I ask you two question about the DRN?

1. I'm the person who file this case, does that mean I am not allow to make a summary about the dispute? I didn't see it in the template.

2. I actually have notified involving parties in their talk pages before you gave me the template of notification. Should I notify them again using the template? -- Fenal Kalundo (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

@Fenal Kalundo: To reply to your questions,

1. Your summary has been included in the dispute overview itself. Since a summary is nothing more than "What you think is the dispute", your dispute overview is treated as a summary itself.
2. There is no need to notify them again if you have already done so. The template is only for convenience and is not mandatory.

A volunteer will open the case after all/majority of other parties have filed their opening summaries. If you have any further doubts, please ask them at The Dispute resolution noticeboard talk page. Yashovardhan (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Fenal Kalundo (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)