User talk:Shusilence

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Shusilence, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Draft:Zebronics seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 18:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is Shusilence's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zebronics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shusilence, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clickindia.com (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clickindia.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India

Please remove the template { { WikiProject India } } from your user page. The user page does not come under the project's ambit, in my knowledge. Thanks. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 08:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shusilence - noted your reply in my talk page and thank you for removing the template. Take your time to learn all aspects of editing - including the concepts of templates, the automatic categories some of them include, etc. Wish you all the best. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 05:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Draft:Zebronics

I saw that you had removed AFC comments and decline statements in your edit to Draft:Zebronics. I've restored them back. Please note that these comments are there to help editors and reviewers interested in the draft. They are automatically removed if the draft is moved into main space. Until that happens, please do not remove these. This is a gentle warning against the same. such editing is generally considered disruptive otherwise. Yashovardhan (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zebronics has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zebronics. Thanks! Yashovardhan (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since the draft was last reviewed there has been one change in the references. The first reference, to a company profile on the Bloomburg site has been added. This only provides superficial coverage (the name of the company, the industry it is in and its address). This and the other references fall short of providing substantial coverage of the company by multiple, independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zebronics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebronics (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although there has been considerable copy editing, I would stress on using good reliable references that give a considerable coverage to the company - not the products but the company as a whole. The first 2 references are just mentions which mention a couple of products branded under this name. The third reference provides a very brief intro to the company while still mentioning a product.The fourth one is a small editorial about VR devices made by Zebronics. The fifth reference is just used to support the award i.e. just a mention about the company in the ET awards page. The sixth one is a good piece with details about the company - its a story about the company's brand ambassador but it cannot alone establish notability. The last reference is again a good reliable piece but it cannot establish notability. What is needed is coverage which talks more about the company than about its product. The last 2 references are the only one which can be said to contribute to notability. Couple this with the fact that the language used in the article is slightly promotional (as in the Brand ambassador section), I would not say its ready for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zebronics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zebronics

Please note per WP:OLINK that major geographical locations (countries) are not wikilinked, and that punctuation goes before references. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 11:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not link countries and punctuation goes before refs. Your editing habits could easily be considered disruptive and, if you continue the same pattern and to tendentiously submit the draft without fixing the issues highlighted by the reviewers, could lead to the loss of editing privileges. Eagleash (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Theri (soundtrack)

Please be aware of the spacing you put in your articles. There is no need for all the double spacing. I renamed and formatted Theri (soundtrack) to adhere to the wikipedia guidelines the best I could. Please see WP:MOSALBUM for more guidelines. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 00:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD

Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices from pages or remove other people's comments in Miscellany for deletion pages, as you did with Draft:Zebronics. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information, I am an editor of five years experience with 65+ articles created without any problems. I have tried to edit your draft to correct basic errors and you have on several occasions just undone my corrections despite messages at your talk page. Please do not comment on other editors in a negative manner, however mild that comment may be. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fightmore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 12:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]