User talk:5.226.137.179

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Dan Wagner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hayman30 (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 5.226.137.179 (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (5.226.137.179) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:14, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

5.226.137.179 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request I be unblocked. My edits to the Dan Wagner page are valid edits which I posted on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#Venda on 3/7/17 for other editors to discuss. I've also requested other editors opinions and tried dispute resolution over the intro. As you can see, no other editor engaged with the points raised before the changes were made to the article. The changes are sourced and verified. When the other two ip users and Techtrek reverted the changes, no of them engaged on the talk page to explain their objections and removed the valid sourced points. 5.226.137.179 (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to request I be unblocked. My edits to the [[Dan Wagner]] page are valid edits which I posted on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#Venda on 3/7/17 for other editors to discuss. I've also requested other editors opinions and tried dispute resolution over the intro. As you can see, no other editor engaged with the points raised before the changes were made to the article. The changes are sourced and verified. When the other two ip users and [[User:Techtrek|Techtrek]] reverted the changes, no of them engaged on the talk page to explain their objections and removed the valid sourced points. [[Special:Contributions/5.226.137.179|5.226.137.179]] ([[User talk:5.226.137.179#top|talk]]) 17:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request I be unblocked. My edits to the [[Dan Wagner]] page are valid edits which I posted on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#Venda on 3/7/17 for other editors to discuss. I've also requested other editors opinions and tried dispute resolution over the intro. As you can see, no other editor engaged with the points raised before the changes were made to the article. The changes are sourced and verified. When the other two ip users and [[User:Techtrek|Techtrek]] reverted the changes, no of them engaged on the talk page to explain their objections and removed the valid sourced points. [[Special:Contributions/5.226.137.179|5.226.137.179]] ([[User talk:5.226.137.179#top|talk]]) 17:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to request I be unblocked. My edits to the [[Dan Wagner]] page are valid edits which I posted on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dan_Wagner#Venda on 3/7/17 for other editors to discuss. I've also requested other editors opinions and tried dispute resolution over the intro. As you can see, no other editor engaged with the points raised before the changes were made to the article. The changes are sourced and verified. When the other two ip users and [[User:Techtrek|Techtrek]] reverted the changes, no of them engaged on the talk page to explain their objections and removed the valid sourced points. [[Special:Contributions/5.226.137.179|5.226.137.179]] ([[User talk:5.226.137.179#top|talk]]) 17:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.