Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Pappy (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Young Pappy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The contents fail to show effort of popularity or circuit of fame whatsoever. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - As I said at the first AfD, while tragic, all the press is related to his shooting, which would be a case of WP:BIO1E. Closed as no consensus, the single "keep" !vote was based on a single article, which ignored the fact that the article was focused on the rapper's shooting. Again, going to BIO1E. Onel5969 TT me 13:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep has significant coverage in reliable sources, there are plenty in Google news search shown above (it isn't necessary to reproduce them) the Vice article here is significant coverage about his whole life not just his shooting and states that he was famous before he was killed with over a million and half downloads on soundcloud so WP:BIO1E does not apply Atlantic306 (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the significant coverage of periods of his life other than the fatal shooting. here is another one.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 13:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 68.189.200.18 (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)