Jump to content

User talk:Cjcollier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Klacquement (talk | contribs) at 03:03, 5 October 2006 (Morewellian). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

FearÉIREANN: Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. FearÉIREANN\(caint)


cj:

Can you describe "advertisement"?
Are you referring to the creation of Bloggers_for_Peace and listing it as a better way to bring peace than by vandalising the George W. Bush wiki page? I do not see this as advertisement. I have also mentioned general Activism. If you wish to remove Blogers for Peace, please leave the link to Activism. It will likely greatly reduce vandalism of the George W. Bush wiki entry.

FearÉIREANN: Adding in links promoting links pushing an agenda is not the way to deal with vandalism. Your Bloggers for Peace has already been nominated for speedy deletion. Please stop using WP to push any political agenda. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C.J.:

If this is the decision of the WM board, I agree with it. However, I believe that having such a wiki entry will reduce the vandalism done to the George W. Bush page and encourage a more healthy discussion.

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Never remove a deletion vote page from an article. It is seen as serious misbehaviour. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C.J.:

My apologies. I did not intend to remove a deletion vote. What is it and when did I delete it? I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia content creation.
Please clarify your above comment: Adding in links promoting links pushing an agenda


Never:

Any deletion box that generates a vote has to remain in location until a decision is taken. If you see {some text} never delete it unless you know what it is and are deleting it for a reason (for example, an outdated link, etc). It was because I suspected it may have been an innocent error that I did not enforce the final notice warning and place a block. Just be careful.
BTW I don't doubt your sincerity but we cannot have a page like that as a list. As an encyclopaedia we have to follow certain standards of neutrality. You and I may both be anti-war, but we cannot use WP to promote that agenda. But links like that can be put on your user page. Blogs by their nature aren't neutral sources but personal opinions and cannot be used as links and references on WP. Slán FearÉIREANN\(caint) 22:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cj:

Thank you for the clarification and for your understanding. I will move personal opinion content activism to my user page.

Thanks for uploading Image:MaxDB.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Morewellian

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Morewellian. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 21:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Morewellian

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Morewellian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Morewellian. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Klacquement 03:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cjcollier&oldid=79579798"