Jump to content

Talk:World News Media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scottrouse (talk | contribs) at 12:14, 22 August 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCompanies Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

PROD

Scottrouse I invite you to explain your concerns in more detail here, and would ask you if you represent or work for this business. Please note that information that may be negative(which I'm not sure how it even is in this case) isn't grounds to delete an article. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Have removed the PROD, as the editor has a highly probable COI, which I have raised on their talkpage. Edwardx (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. My concern is that the article in question does not lend anything particularly useful as an encyclopedia entry. Edwardx appears only to have attempted to discredit World News Media and its associated awards by including it in a Vanity awards category and linking to a negative opinion piece in which the one example given is World News Media. Perhaps if we are going to have a discussion, Edwardx would like to disclose what his COI is? If you are being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must declare who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship as per the wikipedia conflict of interest page. While I would like to assume good faith, I don't think the article in question maintains a neutral tone and remain suspicious of the editor's motives. Scottrouse (talk) 12:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]