User talk:Bjenks

Welcome to my talk space! A discussion started here will be continued here. One started on your talk page is best continued there but, if you reply on this page, I will keep the whole discussion here.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Long standing item fyi Martyn_Webb JarrahTree 05:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo! I plan to contribute in due course. Bjenks (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Busy day, I am sure of their circle there are more to track down and start stubs JarrahTree 10:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ahh ironies of ironies this am - he is questionably not notable? interesting the notability tagger added the oxford obit - some marvellous material in that. JarrahTree 23:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

...when you edited Shirley Finn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC television DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--that's now fixed. Bjenks (talk) 14:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

...when you edited Schweppes Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph... DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's now fixed. Bjenks (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

...when you edited Lloyd Rayney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chaney... DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--that's now fixed. Bjenks (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

meetup 37

might interest you? any thoughts about the strategy process viz what I have been posting around - I would be very interested in your thoughts JarrahTree 03:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. As a casual and eclectic editor, I'm normally inclined to leave organisational stuff to others. However, I'm now reading this here. I approve of the process, its goals and methods, and will try to chip in before 12 June. So thanks for the head-up. Meetups are out for me, and I'm expecting a funeral flight to the UK at zero notice any day. Bjenks (talk) 07:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Pell

Hello, I'm Cjhard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cjhard (talk) 15:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Item restored from deletion by Cjhard (talk, pending satisfactory discussion. Reply follows.)

Your reverting edit was obviously over-hasty and hence in error. I am restoring my edit and expect you to provide valid reasons for ~~rejecting correct orthography and~~ content cited from a reliable source. Your contention that serious and pointed international comment on Australia is "irrelevant" requires fuller justification on the talk page. (It appears only at the very end of a very long lead and is incontrovertibly verified.) Bjenks (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about being snippy about this earlier. I've been dealing with some difficult editors recently, which led me to think that you were a difficult editor, which made me a bit of a difficult editor, which is a bit of an awful cycle. I'm happy to discuss the inclusion of the information in the article in some way if that's an issue you would like to raise again some time in the future. All the best, Cjhard (talk) 22:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The sentiment is appreciated. Yes, Wikipedia suffers from excesses of ego and pomposity which it's best to stand back from for a while. Pell's story will look after itself when the time comes. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

difficult editor the enth...

Please note that our presence in BiblioTECh means we have things going on - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiClubWest - not expecting you to be interested in all of it - there might be something that looks interesting - would be great to see you at some stage - cheers JarrahTree 09:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RVs

Thank you, Bjenks, for your considerate and highly Wiki-professional msg On my Talk page. Please allow me a bit of time before I respond later today. I am sure that we can find a common ground in which to respect the sense of your edits and my mild objections to a small part of them. regards, Sensei48 (talk) 17:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the patience. I just rv'd my rv. There is really only one issue of punctuation I would like to address, and I can do that manually. regards, Sensei48 (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frank The poet

Hi: I have added additional questions in regards to my information on the Frank The Poet talk page if possible could you read these and provide me with your thoughts?

Thanks GeoffRedbacks Again (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]