Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Carbonell (friar)
- Tomás Carbonell (friar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Re-nominating on behalf of ReeceTheHawk, who nominated the draft at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Father Tomás Carbonell with the rationale: "Relies on one source and isn't long enough to become an article." – Joe (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Contrary to the nomination statement, this stub is actually based on three quality secondary sources, all of which cover Carbonell in reasonable depth, and one primary source that is used sensibly. I would have thought as a royal confessor and bishop his notability would be obvious. There is plenty of room for expansion. – Joe (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep A well-sourced - if brief - page on a Bishop. See WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Here are additional sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The guy was the confessor of a King of Spain in the 17th century. That's obviously a position of great influence and significant historical relevance. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 12:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)