User talk:冏

November 2012

Hello, I'm Phoenix7777. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tofu because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on the article's talk page. Thanks! (diff) ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 08:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Celestial Empire (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Celestial Empire (disambiguation), 冏!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have made a few changes per MOS:DAB.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 冏. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your recent editing history at Hanfu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please discuss the disputed content at Talk:Hanfu rather than repeatedly reverting, which could lead to you getting temporarily blocked from editing. theinstantmatrix (talk) 08:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Hanfu. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Hanfu in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 20:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have to tell you why. I checked all No1lovesu did with Hanfu in both English and Chinese wiki. He was canceled many reliable sources of the Manchurian conquer of Ming deliberately, and try to make Hanfu a "Internet made clothes". I don't know why No1lovesu did it. No1lovesu start to puthis own thoughts into the article from 22/10/2016. I'm sorry to say that, but I have to say. In support of his opinion, he pinged the “third party” and professional wiki editor to only satisfy his purpose, and he disguised himself as an innocent victim to deceive the “third party”.--冏 (talk) 20:18, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]