User talk:Eio

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Eio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 23:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7068 aluminium alloy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zink. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German Gliding Museum

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of German Gliding Museum, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The German Gliding Museum. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The plan was changing the name. Thank you for the hint about moving a page! --Eio (talk) 06:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eio. I have deleted the new page so that you may do so. Unfortunately, copying content from one page to another without proper attribution violates the copyright of our contributors. When we want to keep both articles active (such as when we are splitting content out), we do this through attribution templates and edit summaries, but when we want all development to move from one page title to another, we must move the page instead. If you need assistance with moving the page to the proper title, please let me know. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll try. I just think that the article "the" is useless there. All other museums do not have it. --Eio (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. It's a good change. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:56, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Omega Tau Podcast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Omega Tau Podcast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering 02:20, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted the page Omega Tau Podcast just five hours after it was created, in the middle of the night (for Europe), so that no discussion was possible. You did not even let me the time to save a draft and continue working on it, but just destroyed the work, without any respect.

Think about that Wikipedia is not your property but a democratic project. No one will be disturbed by a new page in work which already contains informations but still is incomplete. On the other hand, with your dictatorial methods you demotivate users who might give a positive contribution to Wikipedia, and as I see in your discussion page, I am not the only one. You pretend to be the best and destroy the work of the others.

Omega Tau is a science and engineering podcast which has the same right to be on Wikipedia as a book. Since it contains interviews to experts in the fields, it can be used as a source for scientific and technical information exactly as a book.

I just began translating the German page but you deleted it with your dictatorial methods before I or someone else could continue. Please, reverse what you did, wait a week and think about it again. --Eio (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Go away

Stop posting on my user talk page, I can delete what I effing like there. If you continue, you will be in breach of Wikipedia etiquette and you may find sanctions imposed against you. We are building an encyclopedia here, not playing at children. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steelpillow, you deleted my work on the page flying wing and keep refusing to explain why. You refuse a discussion on your discussion page, where you delete my comments. On the discussion page on flying wings you refuse giving an answer, because you are offended that I apparently do not assume your good faith. Don't you think there is something wrong with you?

With your authoritary behaviour, you demotivate other users, and you are the first one not assuming their good faith. -Eio (talk) 13:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steelpillow, I posted on your discussion page the following trial to start a civil discussion, which you deleted. Maybe you want to discuss it here. -Eio (talk) 14:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we discuss on Talk:Flying wing whether my edits fits in the page or not and here our private issue. Let's try to begin again. I made two edits which for some reason you considered as not appropriated. Of course, I do not think you have any private reasons to delete them, since few people might have private interests in the history of some technology. However, if you assume good faith, as you expect from me, you will understand that I worked quite a lot of time to write my edits with all the links and sources and I am quite upset to see it was deleted without giving a reason.

So can you be civil, stop taking your time to attack me personally and discuss why my edit was not appropriate in your view, maybe suggesting an alternative? -Eio (talk) 14:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]