User talk:Lil bklyn

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lil bklyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is not a sock puppet. This account was created from the public NYLXS library. dig www.nylxs.com.

Decline reason:

I don't believe you are unrelated to that blocked user. Yamla (talk) 14:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lil bklyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to finish the article on PBMs

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lil bklyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

checkuser is obviously broken. What is this, the Gestapo that allows for rote propaganda. There are no morals here?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=checkuser is obviously broken.  What is this, the Gestapo that allows for rote propaganda.  There are no morals here?   |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=checkuser is obviously broken.  What is this, the Gestapo that allows for rote propaganda.  There are no morals here?   |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=checkuser is obviously broken.  What is this, the Gestapo that allows for rote propaganda.  There are no morals here?   |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lil bklyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Users may be blocked from editing by Wikipedia administrators to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia.

I haven't disrupted anything

Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption.

I haven't damaged or disrupted anything

You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators:

       that the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:

Since I haven't disrupted anything there is no need for a block

       that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make

productive contributions instead; or:

       that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

I am not accused of anything to defend. I have made edits on medical issues, been contructive and cited details in articles that are marked for improvement.

It also helps to clearly state your reasons for requesting an unblock because:

       If the background or reason isn't clear, your request may be declined out of hand.

Your preventing improvement of articles and expertise.

       In complicated situations, the reviewing administrator may not want to spend a long time reading your whole talk page and all of your contributions. Information and evidence not in your unblock request may not be viewed.
       If you make repeated invalid or offensive unblock requests, your talk page access may be revoked which makes it even more difficult to request unblocking.

I am only guilty by association.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Users may be blocked from editing by Wikipedia administrators to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 
::I haven't disrupted anything

Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption.
::I haven't damaged or disrupted anything

You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators:

        that the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:
::Since I haven't disrupted anything there is no need for a block

        that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make 
productive contributions instead; or:
        that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

::I am not accused of anything to defend.  I have made edits on medical issues, been contructive and cited details in articles that are marked for improvement.


It also helps to clearly state your reasons for requesting an unblock because:

        If the background or reason isn't clear, your request may be declined out of hand.
:: Your preventing improvement of articles and expertise.

        In complicated situations, the reviewing administrator may not want to spend a long time reading your whole talk page and all of your contributions. Information and evidence not in your unblock request may not be viewed.
        If you make repeated invalid or offensive unblock requests, your talk page access may be revoked which makes it even more difficult to request unblocking.
::I am only guilty by association. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Users may be blocked from editing by Wikipedia administrators to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 
::I haven't disrupted anything

Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption.
::I haven't damaged or disrupted anything

You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators:

        that the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:
::Since I haven't disrupted anything there is no need for a block

        that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make 
productive contributions instead; or:
        that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

::I am not accused of anything to defend.  I have made edits on medical issues, been contructive and cited details in articles that are marked for improvement.


It also helps to clearly state your reasons for requesting an unblock because:

        If the background or reason isn't clear, your request may be declined out of hand.
:: Your preventing improvement of articles and expertise.

        In complicated situations, the reviewing administrator may not want to spend a long time reading your whole talk page and all of your contributions. Information and evidence not in your unblock request may not be viewed.
        If you make repeated invalid or offensive unblock requests, your talk page access may be revoked which makes it even more difficult to request unblocking.
::I am only guilty by association. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Users may be blocked from editing by Wikipedia administrators to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 
::I haven't disrupted anything

Blocks are lifted if they are not (or no longer) necessary to prevent such damage or disruption.
::I haven't damaged or disrupted anything

You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators:

        that the block is in fact not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:
::Since I haven't disrupted anything there is no need for a block

        that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make 
productive contributions instead; or:
        that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and you are unintentionally blocked as a result because you use the same IP range).

::I am not accused of anything to defend.  I have made edits on medical issues, been contructive and cited details in articles that are marked for improvement.


It also helps to clearly state your reasons for requesting an unblock because:

        If the background or reason isn't clear, your request may be declined out of hand.
:: Your preventing improvement of articles and expertise.

        In complicated situations, the reviewing administrator may not want to spend a long time reading your whole talk page and all of your contributions. Information and evidence not in your unblock request may not be viewed.
        If you make repeated invalid or offensive unblock requests, your talk page access may be revoked which makes it even more difficult to request unblocking.
::I am only guilty by association. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}