Jump to content

User talk:Geekyhistorian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Geekyhistorian (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 19 February 2018 (→‎alright we're trying this again ig: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

blocked from editing...not sure how to do this

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geekyhistorian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

ok, so i was blocked on grounds of suspected sockpuppeting, but I don't know how to prove this is my only account. Not sure how this appeal thing works, but if it helps, all my contributions are on the talk page for John Laurens

Decline reason:

You need to explain your relationship with EmyBondevik13 (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • @Geekyhistorian: I'd suggest that you read the guide to appealing blocks carefully, and update your unblock request with more information. If you're in the wrong, it really helps to be honest and ask forgiveness. If you're not, maybe you can offer the administrators some reasonable explanation for why the logs would indicate a second Wikipedia account was using the same computer that you were using. In addition to addressing their finding of sockpuppetry, try to give them other good reasons to unblock you. I do believe they work hard to be fair. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

alright we're trying this again ig

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Geekyhistorian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

alright, so my first attempt was declined on grounds of not stating my relationship with EmyBondevik13 so here we go...I don't know how to prove that this is my only account, I've never collaborated anything with EmyBondevik13. Personally, I don't know how similar writing style can be used to block on grounds of suspected sockpuppetry. Like I said, I don't know the other user, and an IP check would reveal that we aren't the same computer/network or whatever. Thanks.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=alright, so my first attempt was declined on grounds of not stating my relationship with EmyBondevik13 so here we go...I don't know how to prove that this is my only account, I've never collaborated anything with EmyBondevik13. Personally, I don't know how similar writing style can be used to block on grounds of suspected sockpuppetry. Like I said, I don't know the other user, and an IP check would reveal that we aren't the same computer/network or whatever. Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=alright, so my first attempt was declined on grounds of not stating my relationship with EmyBondevik13 so here we go...I don't know how to prove that this is my only account, I've never collaborated anything with EmyBondevik13. Personally, I don't know how similar writing style can be used to block on grounds of suspected sockpuppetry. Like I said, I don't know the other user, and an IP check would reveal that we aren't the same computer/network or whatever. Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=alright, so my first attempt was declined on grounds of not stating my relationship with EmyBondevik13 so here we go...I don't know how to prove that this is my only account, I've never collaborated anything with EmyBondevik13. Personally, I don't know how similar writing style can be used to block on grounds of suspected sockpuppetry. Like I said, I don't know the other user, and an IP check would reveal that we aren't the same computer/network or whatever. Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}