Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq (2nd nomination)

Khadija Mushtaq

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq
• Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq (3rd nomination)

Khadija Mushtaq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete it as poor sourced and promotion material about her — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.40.48.206 (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2018‎ (UTC)

Created for IP using rationale left on talk page. ~ GB fan 19:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Sources here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
• Comment - Poorly sourced articles do not qualify for deletion, but rather a flag for editing required. Focus on the individual, not the qualities of whoever wrote the article. Pilot333 (talk) 02:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - Poorly sourced event pormoational marterial found about the subject with her education system she is promoting her school by using Wikipedia. Dell5010 (talk) 06:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)