Talk:Conor Lamb
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled
I strongly disagree with the redirect on this article.
Conor Lamb clearly meets both these criteria for notability:
"significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article".
I apologize if I am not going about this properly. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. Quigley david (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Ongoing discussion here: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 January 13 Casprings (talk) 03:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Free Beacon Internet Comment
I reverted this add [1] I think there are two issues. One is about the source. It is politically motivated and bias. Not WP:RS in this context. The second is WP:WEIGHT. The article is about an Internet comment he might have made from years ago. Lamb can’tremember doing it(it’s an Internet comment at the end of an article). Who knows. That said, it shouldn’t be in a bio.Casprings (talk) 09:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Language in introduction
It is completely preposterous to assume that by enforcing drug prohibition as a prosecutor Conor had any positive effect on the opioid crisis. It reads like Conor Lamb wrote it himself. I have removed that language from the introduction. Sinbadbuddha (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- We are not here to judge the impact of his work. We are here to list what he has tried to do, as documented by reliable sources. Reliable sources heavily document his involvement in prosecuting cases related to the opioid epidemic. The lead accurately reflects that in an NPOV way, with sources. Searine (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)