Talk:Janette Beckman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women artists Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

It's a well written article with good references about a notable subject. However the tone of the article while not containing peacock terms does read like a promotional piece. It could be made a little more matter-fo-fact. Wwwhatsup (talk) 03:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Janette Beckman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not credible

This article is one of a number created by Jgrahame about photographers; these first came to my attention via AfD/Thatcher Keats, which itself prompted AfD/Marissa Roth. Both had references that, on inspection, turned out not to say what they were presented as saying.

The contributor has also created Rose Marasco (first edit), Cey Adams (first edit), Lori Nix (first edit), John G. Zimmerman (first edit), Michael Putland (first edit), and this one (first edit). Until each has its every reference checked, it should carry Template:Cite check.

As a start, I looked at a single paragraph within this article. I found three mis-citations. -- Hoary (talk) 01:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to create an authentic page

There's a lot of talk around the pages I have made over the years. I don't understand why the tone of the complaints is so suspicious. I have tried to make good, authentic entries, looking at others as guides, but apparently the way I have written them all is problematic. It has never been apparent that Wikipedia entries need to be written by some sort of Wikipedia expert. I enjoyed it but I won't contribute again.