Talk:List of royalty by net worth

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility List‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Politics List‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royals?

The term "royals" is naff at best. Is there a compelling reference for this neologism? --Nick Bell (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a standard term used by the source. It isn't a neologism; it's been used as a noun since at least 1440 according to the OED, which also gives representative examples of modern use by Cecil Beaton, James Lees-Milne and The Independent. DrKiernan (talk) 06:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK - not a neologism; but OED lists it as a colloquialism, other than a Middle English reference from 1573 (With the quene Anne in tombe of marbel stone, Full royally arayed as royals) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickBell (talk • contribs) 10:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)--Nick Bell (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrix is worth a bit more than 200 million: http://www.quotenet.nl/Nieuws/Oranje-boven-koningin-Beatrix-hard-op-weg-naar-1-miljard-26031 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Numtek (talk • contribs) 18:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Updating

Hello everyone. I think that the article needs updating because the ancient king Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud is no longer a king. Regards --Eclipsis Proteo (talk) 22:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update - it seems like soneone took a single article in Forbes from 2011 and created this page. The people and their wealth is out of date and it all seems pretty unsubstantiated. Isn't it just a candidate for deletion?Zero1zero2 (talk) 06:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]