Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Clark

Olga Clark

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; subject does not have significant coverage about her nor did contribute to anything widely recognized per WP:ANYBIO. Being a relative of a famous chess player does not confer notability WP:INVALIDBIO. What are your thoughts? Damselfly7 (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- seems as though her claim to notability is that she wrote articles about her husband, who played chess. Sources are in reference to her husband. Unless I'm msising something ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is somewhat interesting that she appears to have lived to be 106, but that falls short of the supercentarian standard, so we are left with nothing upon which to hang notability. bd2412 T 01:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Her claim of notability is as a muse, similar to Lou Andreas-Salomé and to Alma Mahler, who were also artists, but whose most notable aspect is as muses. She lived to 95, not to 106 (there was an earlier typo in the date of birth). I read the references to be about her personally, not her husbands, although it is about her in relation to her famous husbands. For example, Sosonko in "Russian Silhouettes" almost hardly talks about Capablanca at all, except as a canvas on which to tell a story about Olga. I claim notability based on her having been written about in the linked sources (including books), having multiple very famous husbands, and being a muse at least to one (Capablanca's <href a="http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/capablancaolga.html/">"I shall regain my crown for you"</href>, for example). Dmoskovich (talk) 04:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]