User talk:HFM Expert

This is HFM Expert's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HFM Expert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a joke. Why are you treating me as the villain when the case was opened against Kishfan and his disruptive editing? I reverted it so the article can be kept the way it was originally and the user mentioned can discuss potential changes on the talk page. Why are you threatening me with a block for nothing? I am just following rules here. I dont even have a hand in this article for your kind information. How am I making disruptive edits? HFM Expert (talk) 13:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address the reasons for your block, which is that you were engaging in edit warring to remove content and sourcing. "I reverted it so the article can be kept the way it was originally" is not a valid justification for anything. Opening a case against another user does not mean you are immune from sanctions; see WP:BOOMERANG. And you haven't been threatened with a block; you've actually been blocked. Yamla (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

HFM Expert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was actually writing that reply to the message when he told me to revert my edits during when Black Kite immediately delivered the block. Hence, he didnt even give me a chance to explain my actions. I didnt even decline his request, in fact I was quite happy to revert my reversions if I had broken any rules but he didnt even let me respond. My aim on Wikpedia is to defend against vandalism at any cost, and I just had the best interest of the article in my mind. Keeping it preserved in it's original state. I was quite happy to revert my reversions if they violated any rules. After being on Wikipedia for a year now, I have learned to follow all the rules. This administrator in my view definitely misused his power, as he didnt follow the standard protocol during the edit warring case itself. And regarding content disputes well I didnt even remove any content, the article history proves otherwise. It was the IP address accounts and Kishfan altering the content. Kishfan was having an edit war with those IP address accounts and in the process he had broken the three revert rule which is the reason for me filing the edit warring case itself. I am not the right person to block here, I have no role in the alteration of the article. HFM Expert (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was actually writing that reply to the message when he told me to revert my edits during when [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] immediately delivered the block. Hence, he didnt even give me a chance to explain my actions. I didnt even decline his request, in fact I was quite happy to revert my reversions if I had broken any rules but he didnt even let me respond. My aim on Wikpedia is to defend against vandalism at any cost, and I just had the best interest of the article in my mind. Keeping it preserved in it's original state. I was quite happy to revert my reversions if they violated any rules. After being on Wikipedia for a year now, I have learned to follow all the rules. This administrator in my view definitely misused his power, as he didnt follow the standard protocol during the edit warring case itself. And regarding content disputes well I didnt even remove any content, the article history proves otherwise. It was the IP address accounts and [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] altering the content. [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] was having an edit war with those IP address accounts and in the process he had broken the three revert rule which is the reason for me filing the edit warring case itself. I am not the right person to block here, I have no role in the alteration of the article. [[User:HFM Expert|HFM Expert]] ([[User talk:HFM Expert#top|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was actually writing that reply to the message when he told me to revert my edits during when [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] immediately delivered the block. Hence, he didnt even give me a chance to explain my actions. I didnt even decline his request, in fact I was quite happy to revert my reversions if I had broken any rules but he didnt even let me respond. My aim on Wikpedia is to defend against vandalism at any cost, and I just had the best interest of the article in my mind. Keeping it preserved in it's original state. I was quite happy to revert my reversions if they violated any rules. After being on Wikipedia for a year now, I have learned to follow all the rules. This administrator in my view definitely misused his power, as he didnt follow the standard protocol during the edit warring case itself. And regarding content disputes well I didnt even remove any content, the article history proves otherwise. It was the IP address accounts and [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] altering the content. [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] was having an edit war with those IP address accounts and in the process he had broken the three revert rule which is the reason for me filing the edit warring case itself. I am not the right person to block here, I have no role in the alteration of the article. [[User:HFM Expert|HFM Expert]] ([[User talk:HFM Expert#top|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was actually writing that reply to the message when he told me to revert my edits during when [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] immediately delivered the block. Hence, he didnt even give me a chance to explain my actions. I didnt even decline his request, in fact I was quite happy to revert my reversions if I had broken any rules but he didnt even let me respond. My aim on Wikpedia is to defend against vandalism at any cost, and I just had the best interest of the article in my mind. Keeping it preserved in it's original state. I was quite happy to revert my reversions if they violated any rules. After being on Wikipedia for a year now, I have learned to follow all the rules. This administrator in my view definitely misused his power, as he didnt follow the standard protocol during the edit warring case itself. And regarding content disputes well I didnt even remove any content, the article history proves otherwise. It was the IP address accounts and [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] altering the content. [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] was having an edit war with those IP address accounts and in the process he had broken the three revert rule which is the reason for me filing the edit warring case itself. I am not the right person to block here, I have no role in the alteration of the article. [[User:HFM Expert|HFM Expert]] ([[User talk:HFM Expert#top|talk]]) 19:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note that prior block reviews cannot be removed while you are blocked(they can be once you are unblocked) 331dot (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I apologise I was filing another unblock request. HFM Expert (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]