User talk:Whale Stan

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Corey Lewandowski has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Corey Lewandowski was changed by Whale Stan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955582 on 2018-06-20T01:45:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pitch Perfect 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 01:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Pitch Perfect 3. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. INeedSupport^{(Care free to give me support?)} 02:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pitch Perfect.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pitch Perfect was changed by Whale Stan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873514 on 2018-06-20T02:39:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Whale Stan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All of my edits were factual and were undone for no reason.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=All of my edits were factual and were undone for no reason. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=All of my edits were factual and were undone for no reason. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=All of my edits were factual and were undone for no reason. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}