Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Fenix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The editor whose username is Z0 08:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Fenix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional autobiography, tagged for serious policy failures since forever and the only person with any motivation to fix it - the creator - isn't going to, because it's an advert. Guy (Help!) 19:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has significant coverage in reliable sources such as The Guardian, New York Post, Euro News, Daily Beast etc so passes WP:BASIC. Agree it was far too promotional so have copyedited it to make it less promo, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Not seeing autobio but it was definitely promo, hopefully better now, I dont know if anything negative has been omitted but if so that could be added if its in rs, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep The cleanup by Atlantic shows there is diverse coverage. Could use a little more care from someone, but then again a lot of articles need that!Nobody's Keeper (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since nomination has been edited from a promo into a proper article with sources. ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plenty of coverage now, and thanks to Atlantic306 for the cleanup. — sparklism ^hey! 07:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.