User talk:Cassiopeia

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Deletion page - Claude Darbos

Hello, why do you want to delete this page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Darbos Here is the wikipedia French page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Darbos Should I correct this page with more links? Thanks, Advim Advim (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advim Hi Good day and thank you for the question above. Please see below:

Wikipedia sister pages (different languages) do had dfferent notability guidelines and policies. What is acceptable in FR Wiki might not be acceptable in EN Wiki.
You have copied and pasted the content in translation from FR Wiki to EN Wiki. As you are not the original author in FR Wiki - see here [1], thus a proper attribution need to be paid to the article's authors in FR Wiki. I do strongly encourage you to write articles in your own words in the future.
As per Wikipedia Rugby Union notability guidelines, Claude Darbos fails to meet the requirements as Mr Darbos played for US Dax, a Pro D2 club in France, and he has not competed in any Rugby World Cup, Rugby World Cup Sevens or Commonwealth Games match before.
For a subject is not notable, no amount of editing would merit page in Wikipedia.

I believe I have answered your question. Do drop by if anything needs to be discussed. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the reply.

Claude was finalist at the Top 14 so he meets the eligibility criteria. I do not understand your reasoning. thanks anyway :) Advim (talk) 22:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advim Hi, I am not sure what you referred to "top 14"; however, do note rugby player notability requirements are based on either the player has played at least a match in Rugby World Cup, Rugby World Cup Sevens or Commonwealth Games either the player represents (1) one of the "High Performance Unions" nations (Argentina, Australia, British and Irish Lions, Canada, England, Fiji, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Romania, Samoa, Scotland, South Africa, Tonga, United States, and Wales) or (2) " Non-High Performance Unions nations" that have appeared at the World cup (Georgia (2003, 2007, 2011 and 2015), Ivory Coast (1995), Namibia (1999, 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2015), Portugal (2007), Spain (1999), Russia (2011),Uruguay (1999, 2003 and 2015), and Zimbabwe (1987 and 1991)). Being a junior player in US Dax doesnt not meet the requirement above. Secondly, You have might have conflict of interest (COI) affiliation as here [2] and [3], see as you are the manager of Claude Darbos's grandson, Paul Darbos, a social media personality, where his Wiki page has been deleted multiple times - see here [4]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Juzzbaatt - Sangeen Se Namkeen Tak

@CASSIOPEIA Hi,the previous draft page of the article was edited by me also in some aspects (like overview that was written by me,some of upper and episodes part to)was re corrected and @ponyo to was helping me there.You can check the history too.Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asim543 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asim543 Hi, see here [5], there are some edits from you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:47, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA Oh,i thought that some parts were edited my me so it must be related to copyright owner.But now I understand your point.Thanks for helping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asim543 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Have A Question

Hi User:CASSIOPEIA I Have a Question, How do i Become Semi-active on Wikipedia ? TheBigBoss3900 (talk) 06:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheBigBoss3900 Hi Good day. I am not sure what you meant by semi-active here. However, be as active editor as you like or not at all. It is up to you how you would like to spend your time on Wikipedia. Pop by again if I miss understood your question. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheBigBoss3900 Well , as per your userpage , you want to become an admin . Active editors become admins , semi active editors do not . 07:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just gave you some information , how much time you want to spend on Wikipedia is really up to you . Kpgj hpjm 07:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheBigBoss3900 Hi, If your question is about requesting for adminship, your question has been answered at Help desk here -[6]. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MF Doom

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at MF Doom, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. 153.215.18.167 (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

153.215.18.167 hello, the tag was for removing of content. Do seek consensus on article talk page for content removal of BLP as per my previous message to you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At my talk page, you labeled my constructive edits as vandalism. Why do you think ALLCAPS is justified at MF Doom? 153.215.18.167 (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you removed a big chunk of info multiple times, that is the warning all about, you have redone the ALLCAPS to sentence word, and it stays as I did not revert the last one. All good faith and constructive edits are welcome. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't explained why you persistently reverted my constructive edits. Revert only when necessary. You have capitalized the name at the article twice (1, 2) in violation of MOS:CAPS. Do you think it is appropriate?

You claimed that I removed some content "without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary". However, as you can see in my edit summary, I already provided the reason for the removal. Before reverting my edits, you have to explain why you think the reason is not valid. 153.215.18.167 (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the message is automated from vandalism tool and I had left personal message to you on your talk page a number of times on letting you know on the content removal. You have done the proposal on talk page, and wait for interest editor to respond, takes what the consensus result agree upon. Cheers. (I might delay answering you from now as I am watching 2018 FIFA World Cup ENG vs PAN - just to let you know....) CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just provide a reason why you think this edit is vandalism. 153.215.18.167 (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the edit is not vandalism but the tool removed all edits from same user, it was your previous edit (remove of content) the message was meant for. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you use the vandalism tool? If other users' edits are part constructive and not vandalism, you should not use the vandalism tool. Don't blame the vandalism tool. 153.215.18.167 (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tools are designed for their functions for we revert thousands of vandalism and non constructive edits, just as why I use excel/software application on number crunching on thousands of lines on multi work sheets linked across multi workbooks through multi servers across different regions of the world, instead using pen and paper to do my work and send the result via post. I invite you to join the vandalism counter team if you are interested to help out. Cheers CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not what you use but how you use it. What you are doing is mislabeling other users' constructive edits as vandalism, reverting them, and blaming the vandalism tool. The next time you do so, I will report it to ANI. 153.215.18.167 (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have keep on leaving some many messages for on my talk page and your talk page. I left massage to you prior. I am not here to warring with you nor cause displease. All suggest is to go to talk page and seek consensus agreement. As you know about Wikipedia, do leave edit summary on the edit summary for the Bot have not revert your edit and warn you on the first place. Do join the vandalism team, take a course and use the tools yourself as we need helpers if you are interested. I need to go now and return to watch soccer JPN vs SEN. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Cristina Tavera

Hi Cassiopeia, Regarding your marking this page for speedy deletion because for copyright infringement- I looked at the comparisons between the sources that were marked and all of the things marked as "copyright infringement" were proper nouns, such as the names of organizations, places, and because this is an artist's page, the title of the exhibitions that her work has been included in. As proper nouns and titles cannot be edited or paraphrased, how do you advise dealing with this type of marked "infringement"? Thanks. Alizarinc8 (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alizarinc8: Hi Greetings to you. Do agree, many are proper nouns and/however at the same time whole lots are identification from word to word and line by line. As there is no 'fix' how words an infringed is defined, for Wiki news is 4 identical consequent words in a row. However, to say that, I have chekced and removed the COV tag. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Em Rossi

Hi there,

I am having trouble with the notability guidelines- it seems to be the place where I am constantly held up. I notice that you left a message for me on the Draft:Em Rossi Page. There are a plethora of secondary, verifiable sources there, so I'm confused on what is missing. Any help or guidance you can provide would be appreciated.

Thank you! 375mon (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]