Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Alicia Fox you made a mistake

listen you made a mistake wwe announced that Alicia fox announced her participation at the womens royal rumble match its even on the royal rumble 2018 page Check IT OUT ! 
Icy1262 (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
@Icy1262:, You edit "On the January 15th Fox announced that she is entering the women's [[Royal Rumble (2018)] match" on Alicia Fox page was added without citing a source as merely mentioned "Fox announced" is not enough as no inline citation is found for verification. This does not mean there is no source out there to be cited. Please note content added or edited needs to directly support by reliable third party source for verification in Wikipedia and content added to Wikipedia without a source cited will be removed. You could add back the content if you would provide source with inline citation. Please read WP:Citing, WP:IC and WP:SOURCE for details info and hope this would help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 12:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Jiangsu University -warning from You

For the question about JiangSu Unviversity I had added the hyperlink as requestedyesterday. What was that warning for? Please clarify.

I just made it clear about the meaning of Changfeng, a place name which could be meaningful to some people. not sure why was warned by Bot again. 21bbagi (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

By the way, could i ask if there are any standard procedure to revoke the warnings? Thank you. 21bbagi (talk) 10:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@21bbagi: Greetings. Thank you for your questions above.
  1. Jiangsu University - message was given as you did not support your added content with source and you did after the message. So all is good now.
  2. Anhui Medical University- you added "The university is the Best Medical school in Anhui, although there is an emerging Medical school(Medical school of University of Science and Technology of China) is catching up since 2017" - that has no claimed in any source given as could be treated merely opinion. Content added/edited needs to be written in a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV) or statements about the truth of a theory must be based upon independent reliable sources for verification and not based on fringe theory WP:FRINGE.Pls read WP:SOURCE and WP:V for further details.
  3. Changfeng County - the warning message you got was from ClueBot NG which is a machine vandalism script. Reading your edit, I believe that was a false positive, as you merely translate "Changfeng (長豐) means "harvest forever" in Chinese", as the ClueBot might be mistaken from something else. You could report a false positive here, WP:FALSEPOS, stating (1) your username, (2) page/article you were editing, (3) description of your edit and (4) the date and time of the edit (you can find this on the history page of Changfeng County (look for your name). You could added these link for explaining the translation if you wish. [1] and [2] and hope they help. An admin will review your report and will action accordingly.
Finally, I have sent you a welcome message, I suggest you to take a look at the The Wikipedia Adventure for your benefit on contribution to Wikipedia. Once again Thank you for your contribution and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, CASSIOPEIA.21bbagi (talk) 09:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Nafiseh Kohnavard - Biography page

I am adding citation. I have requested some information from the subject (person) and approval to use copyright free material. (I have mentioned that in the Talk page of the Article). WDRezvani (talk) 17:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@WDRezvani:. Greetings, The PROD tag has been removed as one reference/source has been provided by you. Thank your for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I mentioned you in an AfD discussion...

User:CASSIOPEIA, since I mentioned you in this Deletion discussion, I wanted to make sure you were aware of it, I don't want to talk about any editors behind their back! I hope you find my comments helpful as you continue your work to make the encyclopedia better. Thanks! Jacona (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

@JaconaFrere: Greetings, thank you for letting me know and I have commented on the page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, this is exactly how things should work. Keep up the great work! Jacona (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Sam Groth serve

Sam Groth hit 100% of first serves in his doubles match paired with Lleyton Hewitt. Find: www.ausopen.org.au. Jonno64209 (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jonno64209, Greetings to you and thank you for the info above. Your edit "Sometimes plays with leyton . Often loses. Melbourne 2018 100% first serve percentage." on Sam Groth page was added without an inline citation for verification. This does not mean there is no source out there to be cited. Please note content added or edited needs to directly support by reliable third party source for verification in Wikipedia and content added to Wikipedia without a source cited will be removed. You have provided the the web site "www.ausopen.org.au", I think you meant "www.ausopen.org" as I would not find the web site you provided on the internet. You could add back the content if you would provide source with inline citation. Please read WP:Citing, WP:IC. WP:V and WP:SOURCE for details info and hope this would help.
I have sent you a "welcome message" and there are many topics you might want to read as it would help you to gain knowledge on how to perform edit in Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure as it is a fun program in assisting editor in citation, reliable independent source, reversibility and copy right violation. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

MineralTree page

Hi User:CASSIOPEIA! You reverted one of my recent contributions in MineralTree. Why? I deleted unnecessary links from the text.DanRodgers (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@DanRodgers:, Greetings, the edits were reverted as you have delete the sources from the content without stating any reason on the summary edit. If you are changing the article content or remove the source for certain reasons do indicate in the summary brief /edit prior saving. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Cassiopeia/Archive 2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 22:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Endangered Species

Hi User:CASSIOPEIA, When I went on the site, there was random gibberish so I changed to what I thought it was supposed to be. The reverted version looks exactly like my changes. I don't understand what you did.

@KittenDude172: Greetings and thank you for your question above. You have removed seven files/photos from the Endangered species page. user:65HCA7 reverted your edit and I sent you the message to inform you that removing the files/content without a valid reason is inappropriate. I have sent you a "welcome message" and there are some topics would help you on how to edit in Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you also look at WP:Wikipedia Adventure familiar with reliable sourcing, verification and neutral point of view. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Uhhh, I didn't delete any files, could it be the BETA editor?KittenDude172 (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi @KittenDude172:, Greetings. Kindly click here [3] - (the diff on the history page of Endangered Species) , and it shows you removed seven files (photos of animals). You might accidentally removed them; if so, just be careful next time. We all made mistakes sometimes, including I. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi @CASSIOPEIA: Thanks!

Yehoram Ulman page edits

Moved from User:CASSIOPEIA
 – This message was [4] and user has move it here

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

I had been doing big chunks of editing all at once, so did not leave detailed notes. I have now edited one part of the article at a time leaving detailed notes as to why I have done each thing. Most of the relevant information is not lost, but rather consolidated under Other Activities. Other unsourced claims have been deleted. (Smellytap (talk) 4:04 am, Yesterday (UTC+8))

@Smellytap: Greetings, thank you for informing of the above. Appreciate it. I have sent you a "welcome message" and there are some topics might interest you. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


Anđelija Rogić

Moved from User:CASSIOPEIA
 – This message was originally misplaced. Moved by user

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

More sources have been added : L'Internaute (French paper) and serbian version of Hello Magazine. Is this enough? Thanks Abonzz

@Abonzz: Hi Good afternoon, Thank you for informing the above and I have removed the tag on the page. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

WHEEEEE KITTENS!

KittenDude172 (talk) 02:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Roberto Soldić -warning from You

Dear Cassiopeia,

Regarding your message about deleting "Roberto Soldić" page.

I couldn't write all the sources and quotations in one day because it had a lot of text, so please don't delete the page because I will finish it today and add all sources and references. It will be added by tonight. Thank you. Krajten you

@Krajten:, Greetings, Please put at least one inline citation with reliable independent source at the moment and you would remove the tag and continue to provide other source later. You cant find how to input the inline citation here WP:IC. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
OK, no problem, Best regards

Vandalism in Crusades

Dear Cassiopeia: I have been editing Wikipedia on-and-off for years, but in lurking mode only, making only minor fixes like punctuation and grammar. Thus I know almost nothing about how vandals are handled, other than by reverting their edits. I'm writing to you b/c I saw that just a few hours ago you reverted an edit in Crusades made by unregistered editor 42.2.173.229. IMHO your comment to him/her on his/her Talk page was way too kind, as this editor had made other obviously vandalism edits to this same article that also had to be reverted. But perhaps that was your warning to him/her, before you report them on the Incident Noticeboard (which I only just now discovered).

So since you are apparently seasoned in Wikipedia and I am still so green, I'm appealing to you to advise me on what can be done to deal with obvious vandals like 42.2.173.229.

I really appreciate editors like you who give of their time and talent to keep Wikipedia a reliable resource. Martian (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

@Martian: Thank you for comment and write on my talk page. Every constructive editor in Wikipedia contribute in their own way, for you is good copy editing, others contribute content and fight vandalism, and some working on the behind the scenes work such as administration work, maintenance, software building program and etc. We all share one the same vision to reciprocal what the world has given to us by helping Wikipedia to provide free knowledge back.
Below are some info on how to counter vandalism in Wikipedia
  1. Vandalism guidelines - Familiar yourself to the Wikipedia guidelines of what is vandalism and what is NOT and what is a good faith edit or test edit vs bluntly vandalism - see here WP:VAN.
  2. Warning message and level - In normal cases once the editor reach level 4 warning, see warning templates here WP:WARN, then we could report the editor to Administrator intervention against vandalism - see here WP:AIV. However, in certain serious and prolific vandalism we could give Only warning message without going through the level.
  3. Vandalism Tools - Download the tools for counter vandalism. There are a few tools, and one of them is Twinkle (TW)- see here WP:TW. Twinkle allow you to set warning level and type of warning. Note messages from TW is auto generated; however, you could use you own word if you find the auto message from TW is not sufficiently explain what you intended to convey to the editor.
  4. Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy - If you are really interested to know more and do counter vandalism volunteer work (at your own available time of course), you would sign up for Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy - see here WP:CVUA and see which instructor is available to be your mentor. Just a note, the program does take up a lot of reading, exercises and time; however, you could pace yourself on how fast to progress through the course. It took me close to 2 months to get it done, but of course you could to it faster as it was in the year end holiday season when was in the program. However, I highly recommend you to take up program for there is hips to learn.
Take your time to read the links I attached above, as I know there is a lot pages to read. Happy editing and let me know if anything else I could help or need to clarify further. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
@CASSIOPEIA: Thank you so much, Cassiopeia. I will check out the vandalism pages you reference; sadly, I don't have the bandwidth for the Counter-Vandalism Academy at this time.
Intriguing that you chose the name of one of my favorite constellations. I run a blog I call "EarthMoonandStars", where in 2014 I featured the 12 zodiac constellations. I'm planning on writing about more constellations soon; your namesake will definitely be one of them! Martian (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Martian:, Yes Cassiopeia is the constellation, named after the queen of [[Aethiopia] and mother of Princess Andromeda in Greek mythology and she was placed in the sky as a punishment after enraging Poseidon :). Let me know when you wish to contribute your zodiac constellations related knowledge in Wikipedia by writing a few articles, I will forward the relevant links to you for your perusal on how to write an article in Wikipedia and its requirements from the subject such as nobility, reliable independent source, inline citation and verification. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

BMW E46 -Warning about not including Citation

Warning about not including Citation
Hello Cassiopeia,

I received a message from you regarding a change I made on the BMW E46 page. I did not include a citation/source for the info provided, because the info provided came directly from my brain, as I attended the European Drift Championship for several years in a row, and I met all those people myself. Mikeyjack (talk) 14:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mikeyjack:, Good evening, and thank you for the message above. Content added and edited in Wikipedia needs to support by inline citing of a/multiple reliable, independent source/s for verification. I understand your content is derived from your knowledge collection by your experience; however, there is no way for verification. If you find some source to back it up, then you are welcome to add in the content with inline citation. For inline citation please see WP:IC, for independent sourcing please see WP:SOURCE and for verification please see WP:V. I have sent you a "welcome massage" and believe there are some topic would help you to understand how to edit in Wikipedia and I highly recommend you to visit Wikipedia Adventure short program, see here WP:Wikipedia Adventure to for newcomer. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Feburary 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.

New: "Black women"

New: "Mathematicians and statisticians"

New: "Geofocus: Island women"

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Magura Govt. Boys High School

Just a heads up on Magura Govt. Boys High School. I declined the speedy and instead moved it to draft space to be less bitey. Cheers! ----Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Fabrictramp, Greetings. Thank your for informing. Hope more would be done from creator and resubmit. :) CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Jelena Behrend

Hello CASSIOPEIA. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Jelena Behrend, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. Sam Sailor 19:06, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Sam Sailor: Thank you for informing. My nomination is not because of WP:RS but the subject might not meet WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:15, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi C. Speedy deletion under A7 is a much lower bar than deletion under PROD or via a discussion at AFD: we do not judge notability when considering if a subject should be deleted under A7. The moment we begin thinking "he/she may or may not be notable under WP:BASIC (or whatever)", then we are no longer in CSD territory. Have a read on User:SoWhy/Common A7 mistakes. User:Adam9007 has written the essay A7 myths debunked that is also well worth a read. And Common claims of significance or importance is a very handy, rough reference list to consult before tagging with A7. Let me know, if you have any questions, or you need help with anything. Kind regards, Sam Sailor 19:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@Sam Sailor:, Thank you for the info. I have a glance of the links you stated and get a lot of what A7 is NOT and confuse/not sure what A7 is actually is. Just to clearify if I interpret A7 correctly : In nutshell: A7 cares only about the article content that claim of significant in regardless WP:RS, WP:IC could be found in the article, or the the subject notability. Do advise, my understanding of the above is correct. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 20:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
That is correctly understood: if the claim of significance is credible, then no sources (let alone inline citations) need to be present. It is not an A7 candidate. This is, however, not an exact science - if it was, we would have a robot to do the tagging as well as the declining. But A7 is, if you don't mind the language, our crap filter, it is where we filter away "Jublasound is Ohio's up-and-coming boy-band, founded in December 2017. They practise every Wednesday in Steve's father's garage." and "Steven Johnson (born 2004 in Deadville, OH) is the front-figure of the famous, new boy-band Jublasound." You get the picture? Sam Sailor 21:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@Sam Sailor: Hi, Thank you, the "carp filter" analogy explanation suits to a tee. Thank your for the taking the time to advice me. Really appreciate it. Have a good night. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 21:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
YW! Keep up all the good work you do! Sam Sailor 21:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

2 things

Mara Romero Borella has fought the twice with the UFC and once with Invicta and also Angela Rivera-Parr fought for the WMC kickboxing title. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Dwanyewest:, Good day. Thank you for bring the above to my attention.
(1) Mara Romero Borella -I believe you meant List of current UFC fighters - Women's flyweights page as she does not have namepage in Wiki. If so, then the WMG-IGM record is 1-1, as they are WMG-IGM record and not her MMA record.
(2) Angela Rivera Parry - I am not sure who are you referring to as there is no such fighter in UFC or any other promotion as I can find her in the in Sherdog or Tapology.
Should I have mistaken what you meant, kindly clarify and explain further. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Dwanyewest:, after you edits, I understand what you meant now. Thank you and will work on them. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Michael Dadashi

Hello CASSIOPEIA. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Michael Dadashi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: undisclosed paid editing, maybe, but that does not change the fact that the article contains plenty of claims of significance. Thank you. SoWhy 09:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi SoWhy, OK. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
For completing over 100 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Rack and pinion
For maintaining a streak of at least 25 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the rack and pinion. Thanks for your contributions and keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

RfD proposal: List of current UFC fighters

I noticed your RfD proposal because it affects a subject I'm watching, and tried to fix it. It took me a few tries, but I found that if you're copy-pasting from the how-to instructions, it helps to work from a text editor like Notepad, just to strip the formatting. I'm not sure, but it seems that the 2017 editor likes to convert the formatting into wikitext, which breaks the template substitution. Dancter (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Dancter:, Thanks for writing and THANK YOU so much for correctly my edit. Appreciate it. I noticed after I have saved the edit and i didnt know how to fix it. I had read the how to instruction and confused with how to actually apply on the request. I consulted an editor who did a series of pages redirect to another page and he/she was kind enough to provide me the step by step instruction. I tried and seemed I failed miserably. The instructions are as below, kindly advise what I have done wrong or provide a step by step instructions as I have redirect pages needed to raise via redirect discussion page. Thanks in advance. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  • On all the redirects you want deleted replace: #REDIRECT [[Where the article points to]] to {{subst:rfd|content=#REDIRECT [[Where the article points to]]}}
  • Click here to add the redirects you want deleted to today's discussion. Add a new section.
  • Add this text: {{subst:rfd2|redirect=The first redirect page you want deleted|target=Where that article is currently pointing to}}
  • And underneath that: {{subst:rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=The second redirect page you want deleted|target=Where that article is currently pointing to}}
  • Do that as many times as you need to and on the final entry replace the }} with |text=The actions you would like to occur (deletion, re-targeting, etc.) and the rationale for those actions.}} ~~~~


kindly advise what I have done wrong or provide a step by step instructions as I have redirect pages needed to raise via redirect disucssion page. Thanks in advance. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 16:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

After previewing some test edits, I'm wondering if you wikilinked the text when you filled in the "redirect=" field. It's not supposed to be wikilinked. It could be something else, though. I noticed some of the entries cut off a letter too soon, such as that of Michal Oleksiejczuk, which was entered as "Michal Oleksiejczu." Dancter (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Dancter:, If only one of the them , such you pointed out on the above" then it would be only one input incorrectly; however, all the entries I made were incorrect. What I did was use the above instructions and follow accordingly. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The only way I could come close to the errors I saw was when I tried

{{subst:rfd2|redirect=[[Michal Oleksiejczu]]|target=[[List of current UFC fighters]]}}

instead of

{{subst:rfd2|redirect=Michal Oleksiejczuk|target=List of current UFC fighters}}

, which is what worked for me. Dancter (talk) 17:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Dancter:, Ok Thank you. Will try on my next request. Appreciate your help. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Stub tags

Please take care not to add an extra {{stub}} to an article like Ponaschemu which already has a specific stub tag - it just wastes other editors' time. Thanks. PamD 18:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @PamD: Greetings. Thank you for informing. I think I missed the initial tag. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

TJ Dillashaw vs. Cody Garbrandt result

http://www.sherdog.com/events/UFC-217-Bisping-vs-St-Pierre-61989 If you are going to use "KO (punches)" for the Dillashaw/Garbrandt result then the same should be used for the Jedrzejczyk/Namajunas fight, according to your link. I was also told that the results are taken from Sherdog, so both results should be "TKO (punches)" if that's the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.18.138.17 (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


@78.18.138.17: Greetings to you. Thank you for your comment above. Please note that according to mixed martial arts project guidelines in Wikipedia Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts - Method, unless sources within the body text of the article state otherwise, always use the result that is available in a fighter's record at Sherdog Fight Finder - see here WP:MMABOX point 2 on Method. As per the source to Dillashaw/Garbrandt and Namajunas/ Jedrzejczyk the conclusion of the methods were KO - see here [5] and [6] for your reference. All method of the fights record have been rectified. I have sent you a "welcome message and also some editing tips on MMA on your talk page and believe the info would be beneficial to you. I also highly encourage you to check out WP:Wikipedia Adventure on citing, reliable source and copyright subjects and exercise. Thank you and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

The Super Bowl Champions

Hi, I recently made an edit to thee "Vince Lombardi Trophy" and "NFC East" page. I feel these additions were necessary and needed due to the recent Philly Eagles dub over the Patriots. Please consider changing the words back to my original change. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.44.167.194 (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@72.44.167.194: Thank you for the question.You have been blocked at this time of my reply. Here is the comment to you when you are unblocked and back to Wikipedia.
  1. On NFC East page, you have removed a huge chunk of content and replace by "Only the Eagles matter in this division." see here [7]
  2. On Super Bowl LII page, you added profanity comment , see here [8]. For such, admin blocked your account.

Please edit constructively and make good contribution to Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you to read WP:Introduction prior your next edit. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jai2.

The edit done to History of Haryana, I did not removed any content i just elaborated it more and added more details to the event. I just by mistake forgot to describe the changes. The change done is correct and need not to be changed again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jai2 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Jai2:, Hi, Thank your for the question. You have removed the sources/references. See here - [9]. Please note any content added/editor needs to supported by independent reliable source for verification. - See WP:SOURCE and WP:V. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Cassiopeia, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

The deletion of Adamburg

It is quite obvious now that the person who keeps trying to get my page deleted is doing it out of being selfish. I did not make this page out of being selfish or wanting attention. I made this page to inform the public about a new micro nation. I have tons of supporters of Adamburg and not just me. I want Wikipedia to grow in knowledge. And the way to do that is to not let people delete pages for selfish gains.Also, Adamburg was not invented it was a name given a while back to a certain plot of land that is now the country — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adma2618 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adma2618: Greetings and thank you for the question above. Subject of an article/page needs to meet Wikipedia nobility criteria - pls see WP:N. In addition, content in Wikipedia either added/created/edited needs to support by independent reliable source for verification - pls see WP:SOURCE and WP:V. Your article does not meet the abovementioned so it would not merit a page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Marfuz - references

Hi CASS.

Thanks for reaching out re the lack of references on Marfuz’ wiki artist bio article page. I’m new at writing Wikipedia articles and have a hard time figuring out how to create the references section. I tried formulating the article as objectively and non-promoting as possible. Since Marfuz is an upcoming artist he doesn’t have the longest track record yet, which means that he doesn’t have a lot of articles referring to him or his work yet. His work has been officially published to the largest music distribution services like Spotify, iTunes, etc.

Could you please share some insights on what kind of references would validate the content of his artist bio for you? Hands-on examples would be be highly appreciated.

And again, thanks for reaching out.

Kind regards, Tony Tonyhanna (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Tonyhanna:, Greetings. Subject of a page in Wikipedia needs to meet Wikipedia nobility criteria - pls see WP:N and the content needs to support by third party/independent reliable source for verification. References/sources info could be found here WP:SOURCE and for verification pls click here WP:V. Your article doesnt seem to meet the above. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Wrong project attribution?

Please take a look at Toros del Este. Found it during category maintenance work. Looks like the wrong attribution. The article is in Spanish. How to handle this? Nominate for deletion or improvement/translation suggestion? -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

@Bbarmadillo: Hi, Greetings to you and thank you for the question. The Spanish Wiki does have a page of Toros del Este - link here [10]. The EN version is a stub and it does not look like a copy & paste with translation work. It might be user:Rolando creation; however, we cant be sure. However, the EN version does not have any citation and the no proper source is mentioned. The External and see also section mainly point back to the primary source which is not considered a reliable independent source for verification. For any work that is copy and paste with translation from other wiki language site to EN wiki, proper attribution should be made. What you could do is the follow
  1. On article talk page : Any copy-paste requires attribution. Place {{Interwiki copy|url=|title=}} on the English articles talk page, using original wiki language articles URL and title.
  2. On article page - place {{Proofreader needed|'''title of the article'''|'''Wiki language site name'''}}. Example {{Proofreader needed|Toros del Este|es}}
  3. Send a message to English wiki site created and let him/her know about proper attribution policy -see WP:PATT.
If you are interest to work on vandalism work while you are doing category maintenance work you could read about vandalism - see here WP:VAN and tick check on WP:Twinkle on your Preference page where you could warn editors who vandalizes the page. Hope the above help and have a wonderful day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. It has been resolved by other editors. I haven't realized from the very beginning that is was vandalism. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Aza Bridge

Hi, I didn't copy the translation of the article. If there's no mistake in the text, that cannot be considered as copyright violation since it is a translation with my own words. Also the address you've written is given as a reference. Maybe i can improve references, since the text is used on a lot of websites. I hardly see any reason to a speedy deletion. --Rt788 (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Rt788: Hi, thank you for the question. See link here [11] - where google translate which similiar to a few part of your article which you have only added/deleted one word or two. Normal practice is to having four consecutive words same from original source unless they are normal phrasing such as "the event is schedule xxx date or the common name of event, place, person name and title, and others. However to say, it will be subject to the admin reviewing this article to decide if copyright is infringed before deletion is taken place. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

MISTAKE - Epulopiscium fishelsoni

Actually due to my mere mistake I ended up doing a wrong informational edit..! So, I had to change that . Wikishivangi (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Wikishivangi: Greetings. Ok and do note any source content removed or change need to back up by sourced info. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Revert

You should be proactive and responsible and fix bad edits instead of simply reversing them and keeping people misinformed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:48F8:9004:DB6:C5A7:B53C:AAB7:F157 (talk) 20:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@2001:48F8:9004:DB6:C5A7:B53C:AAB7:F157:, Greetings. You had total 3 edits and one of them was the message above. I have checked and I didnt revert your other 2 edits and for such I have no idea what are you pointed at. Secondly, anyone can edit on Wikipedia, provided they edit constructive according to Wikipedia's policies. Thirdly, as a counter vandalism editor, we work on and inform editors when their edits are not constructive but we could chose to improve the edits or not. If you have time resource at your end, do suggest your to help on improving other editors non constructive edits or help on fighting vandalism on Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

శ్రీ వెలుగొండ వేంకటేశ్వర స్వామి

Please {{db-g7}} శ్రీ వెలుగొండ వేంకటేశ్వర స్వామి. It looks like it got deleted as you were getting the translation template ready. Cabayi (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

@Cabayi: Yes, I think so as it was about the same time I wanted to review the page and it was deleted. Thank you for informing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Young Greens of Aotearoa New Zealand

You just reviewed this version of Young Greens of Aotearoa New Zealand. What about its one reference (to the group's Facebook page)? How does the article demonstrate that notability is met? And by the way, these aren't rhetorical questions, but I would like a response (please reply here). Schwede66 02:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

@Schwede66:,Hi Greetings. This New Zealand party already has a page in Wiki EN. see here Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand. I wanted to redirect the the page using Using VisualEditor from Wikipedia:Redirect page instruction, but I tried 3-4 times, the page just hang and did not allow me to save it. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Don't trust VisualEditor! If that's what you intended to do, I shall do it for you. Schwede66 02:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
@Schwede66: Thank you very much Schwede66. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your report at AIV

I want to let you know that your report at AIV was incorrectly placed. It seems you placed it inside the instruction comment instead of below it, and a bot removed it. I've restored it for you in the proper place. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 03:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

@Anon126: - Thank you Anon, I didnt notice and appreciate you restored it for me. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Mel Ainscow

Hi

I have tried to update my text on Wikopedia, simply to bring it up to date, but the changes have not appeared. I'm not clear what citations you need. i really need this text to be up to date. Please advise

Regards Mel Ainscow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Ainscow (talk • contribs) 12:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

HI @Mel Ainscow:, Good afternoon and thank you for the question above. Content in Wikipedia either added/created/edited in Wikipedia needs to support by independent reliable source for verification - pls see WP:SOURCE and WP:V. If you added anything in the content then please provided a citation right after the sentence for content could be removed if no citation and source is provide. I have sent you a welcome message at your talk page and I do suggest you to visit Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia Adventure, there will be some helpful topics on editing in Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Paul S. N. Russell-Gebbett ‎

Hi! Thank you for your reminder. You are absolutely right, of course. I translated the article from Catalan as suggested by an English editor on my talk page, but I could not find the template. I see you have put it yourself. Now I'll know where to find it (I did know its syntax in Catalan Viquipèdia but not in the English Wikipedia). --ReginaManresa (talk) 05:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi @ReginaManresa:, Thank you for understanding as proper attribution should be paid for the initial authors. You could check out the above section "Wrong project attribution?" There are 3 steps which involved interwiki content and get yourself familiar with it as it will come helpful to you. Also, should you need help in English Wikipedia on anything due with editing, you could post you question to WP:Teahouse, there will be some friendly and helpful Wikipedians to assist you. Have a wonderful day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)s
Excellent! Thank you for your help! Best wishes --ReginaManresa (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Removal of height, age and mma records of UFC current fighters list

Hey CASS,

Noticed that the height, age and mma record columns of the list of UFC current fighters are gone. It's pretty useful for MMA fans like myself and am hoping we can work to restore it?

Fartmagician (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC) Cheers, FM

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Widr (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Bola Mosuro

For some reason your page curation script added the nomination for this article to the bottom of an old discussion from 2016. I moved and updated it to a 2nd nomination page, but I don't know what cause the issue so just letting you know about it. WikiVirusC(talk) 14:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@WikiVirus: Hi, thank you for informing and assistance. Appreciate it. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Majid Karimov

Hello

Please help some unexplained content removal in this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majid_Karimov Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acer Comp (talk • contribs) 08:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Acer Comp:, Hi Acer Comp, Editor User:194.135.153.182 removed the content twice and I reverted them. see here the diff [12]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. If he will continue to delete can you please put some protection in this page. make semi-protected. Acer Comp (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
@Acer Comp:Hi , two deletions from the editor might not suffice a protection at the moment but if the the deleting continues, I will request for page protection. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks.Acer Comp (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
@Acer Comp:Hi, Just let you know that the editor has been blocked for the next few days from editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for help. It was happen the same in Russian version of page and during 1 month in January we made semi-protected, some ill-wishers make this. This page of real person and all what is writen on page is true and real history of his life.There are links in the page. Thank you again and best wishesAcer Comp (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Feminism

Hi, I'm BloodyKnuckles1. I believe my edit to feminism was true. They are sexists who do not care about equality, they just blame a bogeyman called patriarchy for their inability to find a job, and expect to be treated better because of their gender. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BloodyKnuckles1 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@BloodyKnuckles1: Hi, Please note that content added or edited need to support by independent reliable source for verification. For reliable source pls see - WP:RS, and for verification please see - WP:V, if you disagree with the current content in Feminism page where there are other view in the subject, you are welcome to add the info as long as you could support with independent reliable source, but do not delete the existing sourced content. Neutrality of the content in Wikipedia should represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint. See WP:DUE Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

You are SO right BloodyKnuckles1! Ya rock! :D DaisyCarpenter7 (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

User 82.112.167.23 and his obsession with this guy Mehsin Nseir

Cassiopedia, I have been noticing that User 82.112.167.23, whom you warned two times for disruptive editing, has been harassing, possibly vandalizing, articles about Russian energy corporations. He keeps putting the name "Mehsin Nseir" in the founders and key people infoboxes about the Russian corporations. There is no evidence of the fact the founder is Mehsin Nseir and the general director is Mehsin Nseir in Rosatom and even though I revert this change and use info from the Russian version article, he keeps changing it. He also does in Rosneft as well but does not respond to the fix I made in deleting Nseir from key people in the infobox. Please address this as he or she probably did not learn his or her lesson on vandalizing and disruptive editing. Thanks.

Josephua (talk) 03:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Josephua:, Hi Good day. Thank you for the above info. The user has been warned and would be temporary banned from editing if the user continues with such behavior. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Josip Artuković

Hi, I don't believe that the fighter Josip Artuković fails WP:NMMA. It's more complicated than this, you can't judge someone's importance and relevance by the number of fights in 2 or 3 promotions that someone said are important (by what criteria?!). That would be way too simple and not correct. For example, in the list (second tier of MMA promotions) you have organizations like Tachi Palace (totally unknown), Rizin (only had few events and they exist for a short period of time), Universal Reality Combat Championship (totally unknown). But you don't have promotions like Final Fight Championship (FFC), Superior FC, Greek Fighting Championship (GFC) etc... This are the promotions that do not come from USA, UK, Brazil or Russia, but are bigger and better and have a very big importance for the European fighting scene. Superior FC is a German promotion (No1 in Germany), FFC is located in Croatia and now USA (KSW and FFC are the best MMA promotions in Europe), and Greek FC is from Greece (very important for this part of Europe). There are many more promotions that are very important but are not in the WP:NMMA list. So you might want to update this list... I know this things because it's my job to know them. I am a well known journalist, TV commentator, editor, writer and I've worked for the UFC, Bellator, FFC, Glory and K-1.

About Josip Artuković. He is a pioneer of MMA fighting on the highest level in his country - Bosnia and Herzegovina. That is his importance. He is one of the first guys from Bosnia and Herzegovina that got a chance to fight for Russian promotions like ABC (on the list), M-1 (on the list) and Final Fight Championship (Croatian - don't know why they are not on the list). Besides that, he is the first person to start somewhat serious MMA promotion in his own country and all this gave him opportunity to work in Ireland as MMA coach and instructor. So he is very relevant for this part of Europe and very important athlete in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Few weeks ago I did a page for Roberto Soldić also from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and now Josip Artuković. My roots are from Bosnia and Herzegovina, so my idea is to do wikipedia pages for the important fighters from this country. Best regards Marko @krajten

@Krajten:, Hi Greetings to you and welcome to Wikipedia. It is good to know we have a well-knowledge MMA Wikipedian join us, this is a pleasure to have for we have someone know the sport well but also a MMA fan who would like to contribute to Wikipedia to share the content to the world. Thank you. I appreciate your comments above and let me share with you about Wikipedia. If you already know, then just skip the below few lines then.
Wikipedia has many Wiki Project Portals. Each project portal defines the guidelines by the consensus decision of the wikipedians who are interested in the project. Most Wiki Project sport would define the notability a player need to play in Olympics game, Commonwealth games, world cup, some major clubs belong to a well-known leagues and etc. For MMA, fighter you could visit Wiki Project MMA - see link here WP:MMA and they were set before my I joined the Wikipedia family. Subjects that earn their pages in Wikipedia needs to meet the nobility criteria, with the support of reliable independent source for verification. For MMA fighter nobility - pls see here WP:NMMA and guidelines on promoter - see here WP:MMATIER -in a nutshell, it defines a fighter needs to have 3 fights in tier one promotion, which are UFC and Invicta. Tier two or below promoters need to have 10 fighters in the top 10 for a period of time to to be place in tier one. I understand, your frustrations, as the nobility of MMA fighters debates and discussions have gone through many rounds. You could have a read the achieve discussion at the MMA project nobility talk - see here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability (there are 10 achieves there). The latest discussion were Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability/Archive 9#New parameters for a Bellator fighter's notability? and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability/Archive 10 when Gegard Mousasi, Rory MacDonald, Matt Mitrione and Ryan Bader joined Ballator.
Personally, I would like to see a few more promotions to get into the tier 1 or allow tier 2 to be part of the criteria and yet, on the other site of the perspective, UFC is still the the organisation holds most all the top fighter according to the ranking from the media. I know there is MMA competition where fighters represent their counties and compete against each other at International Mixed Martial arts Federation, but the standard has not reach to the point like soccer world cup / rugby world cup status to gain the entry of the acceptance of MMA nobility criteria.
To say that, however, I believe there some fighters are as good if not better than that of UFC's who yet to be part of the organisation. If you wish, you could start a discussion at the MMA project nobility talk page and with your in dept knowledge, I am very sure your would put forward your points and see if any changes could be achieved. However, just to let you know, even thought we have a lot (hundred of thousands) of MMA fans read wikipedia MMA fighters' pages and promotion event pages in Wikipedia, the participation of discussion is usually make up of just a handful of us. If a consensus could be made then the guidelines would be changed.
I believe I have answered your questions. If not, then let me know what you need to clarity further. Once again thank you for your contribution and welcome to Wikipedia. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated - Seo Ki-Seog

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Seo Ki-Seog, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Arthistorian1977:, Hi gretings, I dont quite understand what you meant above, as per this log here [13] you have reviewed this page. I have added on some edits today. I might have accidentally un press the review buttom and press review again - and may be because of that you recieved automatic message. Let's me know if this is not the case. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

you deleting my stuff - Gmail

it was my opinion it didnt need a source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dferguson54004 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - I see you are new on Wikipedia, so you probably don't realize that all content added needs to be referenced to reliable sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a blog so we don't add our opinions to articles. - Ahunt (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@Dferguson54004:, Greetings to you Dferguson54004 and thank you @Ahunt:. Your edit (Dferguson54004) on Gmail see here on the diff [14] is an opinion. Please note
  1. Content added/edited/changed in a page need to support by independent reliable source/reference, pls see WP:RS for reliable source - pls see WP:V for verification.
  2. is not a blog, or a social network, see WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK for such please Avoid stating Opinion as facts - please see here WP:YESPOV.
Thank you and have a good day. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Bill Ivey - edits

Dear Cassiopoeia:

I am the very Bill Ivey, and have simply added biographical information to my entry. Hard to source simple, general-knowledge facts like "Ivey was twice elected National Chairman of NARAS" info on current position. This is just basic boilerplate stuff, not opinion or interpretation, and I hope you'll restore.

Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.36.234 (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


@69.174.36.234:, Thank you for your comment above. Please not the warning message, was not pointed at your edit was an opinion, but it indicated that all content added or edit in Wikipedia need to be supported by independent reliable source for verification if not they could be removed. - please see reliable source explanation here - WP:RS and WP:V for verification. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Women and Children First - edit

Thank you for the information Cassiopeia. I will be sure to leave an edit summary in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.84.167.202 (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@135.84.167.202:, Good day and thank you for your message above. I just want to let you know that not only leaving an edit summary would serve well for all the editors to know what you have edited but you remove a sourced content - see here [15]. I have checked and the source was directly pointed to the info in the body text. I have sent you a welcome message and do encourage you to register for your network is a shared account. Also I do encourage you to read through Wikipedia:Introduction and have a look at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Adventure for there are lots of information would help you on editing and contribution to Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Abner Mason - Please wait until all my changes are done before you remove the edits

I am not finished with editing. You keep changing what I edit and I have to start over. Please give us a minute to set up the page, then review everything once it is done. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixandmatched (talk • contribs) 00:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mixandmatched:, Hi, when you removed the content and moved them around, you removed the sources/ references as well. Any content added/edit without supported by direct independent source would be removed. Please place {{in use}} , if you are actively editing this page which need some time to complete it and remove the tag after. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassiopeia/Archive_2&oldid=1212126271"