User talk:Auntieruth55

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by .

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Auntieruth55}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Note code

Here's the code that I use for my ship articles: <ref group=Note>All dates used in this article are [[Old Style and New Style dates|New Style]]</ref>

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

"German war effort" case

Dear Auntieruth55,
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, I would like to inform you that you have been added as involved party in German war effort case. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require assistance.
Sincerely, Kostas20142 (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Kostas20142: I'm not exactly sure what that means? auntieruth (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content
Book review: Recent external reviews
Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I
Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In appreciation

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		I am pleased to present this small token to you in appreciation of the many, many GANs which you have assessed, and the no doubt many, many which you will assess in the future. I am not sure that we deserve to have you working so hard to help us out, but we are glad that you do. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23rd New Jersey Volunteer Infantry

Hi, Auntieruth55, I was wondering if this statue is related to the Battle of Salem Church. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje I'm not sure. It looks like the statue is in New Jersey, yes? You'll have to see if the NJ volunteers fought at Salem Church. auntieruth (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Years after the war was over, the regiment erected a monument—the only one ever erected for a nine-month New Jersey unit—on the Salem Church battlefield, where it stands today'. In that engagement, it was led by Col. Edward Burd Grubb, Jr., who took over command when Colonel Ryerson left to lead the 10th New Jersey Volunteer Infantry in March 1863. Lotje (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Auntie Ruth 55, what the heck as the bot done to the content of your user talk page? Weirde, if you ask me. Lotje (talk) 04:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes Lotje it was weird, but I ignored it....just deleted it. auntieruth (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI...

...you've been here for 9 1/2 years. [1] Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond My Ken :) Thanks! I'm just plodding along doing my "job". auntieruth (talk) 14:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GAN assessing

Hi AuntieRuth. You seem to like assessing my articles . It is much appreciated. Hopefully, the Gothic Wars slip up aside, they don't create too much drama for you; I try to get them there or there abouts before nominating. I have noticed that you assess outside of MilHist on occasion. If you fancy doing so again, I have a pair of articles moldering in Royalty, nobility and heraldry; Anastasius I Dicorus and Theodora Porphyrogenita (11th century). (You may recognise the latter from her walk on roles in a couple of the GANs you have recently assessed for me.) Obviously you assess just whatever you want, but I thought that these might tickle your fancy. (As we sometimes say in the UK.) Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English invasion of Scotland (1385), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crimean Tatars

Hi, can you please continue with your review on this page? Thank you.--Seiya (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Auntieruth55. I appreciate it a lot. The nomination just stood there for half a year until you took to review it.--Seiya (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]