Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leidimar Bernardo Lopes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leidimar Bernardo Lopes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, possibly promotional, likely fake (Forbes reference yields 404 error, nothing on archive.org, no Google results (for the Forbes ref)). Saturnalia0 (talk) 04:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 05:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 05:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

keep he author is trying to improve the text and adapt it to the rules of Wikipedia, it is worth asking for help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisandroes tores (talk • contribs) 15:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Delete I see potential in recreation once we get more sources providing the subject pass WP:GNG. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 02:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep what the article can be improved Selvam HYm •(Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep what the article can be improved Douverton som •(Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Douverton som: Please motivate: Why do you cross-wiki spam the article to other languages? Even without translating it!--Aliwal2012 (talk) 10:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this is another sockpuppet from User:Duccaa. Just watch the pages that he edits (e.g. [Instituto de Ensino Teologico Bíblico do Brasil]) to see that he acts exactly the same way. Joao Xavier (talk) 12:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The link to Forbes doesn't work. The two articles linked do not support claims about wealth. K175 (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable cross-wiki spam. I'll be cleaning up the other language articles soon. Hiàn (talk) 23:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does indeed seem to be a bogus entry. No Portuguese language article but cross-wiki spam, and supporting sock puppets to vote "Keep". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.