Talk:Dadar

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / Railways / Transport Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Now that we've got two templates - Template:Mumbai - Suburban Railway,Central and Template:Mumbai - Suburban Railway,Western, there is a problem of double categorization as both the templates inlclude categorization. Parel, Matunga face same problem. Please suggest a solution. utcursch 08:55, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)

I'll give this a thought and get back. Alren 15:04, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I suppose there should be only one template for all mumbai railroads and we can fill in whether it's western, central or whatever through the template? I've never made a template. Is that possible? --flyhighplato 14:44, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

station common to western and central railways

The article states - Dadar has the only railway station common to both the Central line and the Western line; this makes it a transit point and the most crowded railway station on the Mumbai Suburban Railway.

What about vasai road, Bhusawal?

The quoted line either needs to be removed or qualified with in Mumbai suburban railway system.

199.239.101.125 19:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with history section

The history section is lifted almost word to word from TIFR's Mumbai history web page [[1]]. Could someone at least try to reframe the information in their own words? Copying from another site directly is a violation of wikipedia's principles isn't it? Shravan.Iyer (talk) 15:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section as copyright violation. Can someone research and rewrite the section? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not a copyright violation. As per http://theory.tifr.res.in/bombay/disclaim.html you are free to copy the contents of "Mumbai Pages" as long as you release the contents under a GFDL license. The contents on Wikipedia are released under a GFDL license. The Dadar article is a part of "Mumbai Pages". Kensplanet^T _C 06:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have searched for that disclaimer myself before posting here. Sorry guys.Shravan.Iyer (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Podar and Ruia college are between Matunga and Dadar, and the official address is Matunga, not Dadar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.152.147.44 (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dadar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

Coordinates in this article may need fixing. WikiProject Geographical coordinates and tools on Obtaining geographic coordinates may help. See Manual of Style on how to format coordinates.

Replace the {{geodata-check}} template with {{tlc|geodata-check}} when the request has been accepted or rejected.

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—2409:4070:2098:F221:AE90:C7F8:A9D0:2039 (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]