User talk:Amy wamey

Kshmr

How is removing a name a typo? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a typo because the song is credited by being by KSHMR & Dzeko & Torres. (Or sometimes KSHMR, Dzeko & Torres) as Dzeko & Torres were (at the time) one duo and not separate artists. And the vocalist was not given featuring credit in the song (it was just billed as by KSHMR & Dzeko & Torres)

Rodrgz is mentioned in the source. You can't omit him without a clear explanation as to why. And you can ping me by writing {{ping|NeilN}} and remembering to sign your posts with ~~~~ --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information on pinging. I have a possible suggestion. Maybe add "featuring uncredited vocals from Rodrgz" as that both clarifys that they were involved and that they were not a credited artist at the same time @NeilN:

Use the article's talk page to suggest that and pings won't work if you don't sign your posts. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States of America

Please stop adding "United States of America" to the lead of US cities and towns, as a) it is not necessary unless there is another city and state with the same name somewhere other than in the US, and b) where it is needed, "United States" will do. General Ization ^Talk 21:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple countries have similar titles. Eh. United Mexican States. And some people know the USA as "America" more than "united states" it's purely intended to give the article more clarity

January 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you @Qaei: for being super nice Amy wamey (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop

Please stop your edits at Kshmr. You had already been warned about your edits. Give a little time on how Wikipedia works. If you won't stop then you will be blocked from editing. Anmolbhat (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kshmr. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 21:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hello. Please see WP:OVERLINK to understand why I undid your edit to Harry Houlahan. That section of Wikipedia's Manual of Style suggests that "A good question to ask yourself is whether reading the article you're about to link to would help someone understand the article you are linking from. Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are not usually linked". Major geographical locations, which would include England, are among "the following", and are unlikely to add context to a birthplace in an infobox. In addition, it's pretty standard practice in editing UK-related articles not to extend England to England, United Kingdom. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked from editing?

I was given neither explanation or warning for this Amy wamey (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both the explanation and the multiple warnings are still in place, right here on your Talk page. Take the time to click on the blue links in them to read about the policies we tried, in vain, to bring to your attention before you were blocked. General Ization ^Talk 00:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]