Jump to content

User talk:Jpgordon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 41.218.207.124 (talk) at 15:50, 24 September 2018 (→‎Sock: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.


ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jpgordon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Unblocking two editors

I think it would be safe to assume good faith and unblock these two:

CC: User:Boing! said Zebedee

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 03:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Done. I'll keep an eye on their contribs. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

I told Clockback that I will transfer the points made on his talkpage to the WP:AN board. He can't reply to the points raised on WP:AN directly. This is completely standard practice -- I have done it many times before. And you go and remove his talkpage access. What the hell? Makes me despair. Kingsindian   18:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that the "verbiage" you were talking about was him responding to stuff at WP:AN, which I specifically told him he could do, so I can transfer it over? Did you know that a block review at WP:AN was going on? What is the hurry that you couldn't wait till the block review is over? Kingsindian   04:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day


Inglorious response

I do not think your comments at User_talk:120.17.85.26#Block_appeal give you any credit. —DIV (120.17.228.20 (talk) 03:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I don't recall asking for any. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

Worryscott has returned as Flockatucka. Removing same material [2] [3] & [4] [5]. Using the same edit summary "fixed" [6] [7] 41.218.207.124 (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]