Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeewayHertz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LeewayHertz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY with no significant coverage that would indicate notability. A Google News search yields only 30 hits and most of them are either press release or blog posts. I'm also nominating the following article created by the same (COI) editor on the founder of this company who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - Per nominator.Nothing close to any significant coverage (and the entire coverage in RS is itself on a single trivial event) can be located.And, I dislike tea.∯WBG^converse 19:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did some article clean-up previously but my WP:BEFORE at that time agreed that this was likely notable. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarifying that my BEFORE indicated likely not-notable. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
added more references and awards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykanah (talk • contribs) 05:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and I have removed those sources you added because they're not reliable and nowhere mention "LeewayHertz" or "Akash Takyar". Please see WP:RS for more. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akash has been awarded as best enterpeneaur of the year award in 2007 by Orrisa Government. Is this appropriate for notability? Inventing tea making robot is itself a notable. It has given new revolution to artificial intelligence.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykanah (talk • contribs)

Indira Gandhi Priyadarshini Award is not a notable award. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what about his invention of tea making robot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykanah (talk • contribs) 06:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more references that show cases its notability and proves leewayhertz as one of the most notable blockchain developers in world.--Mykanah (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed them again. All these user-generated blog type websites do not setisfy what WP:RS required nor they establish notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - As per Winged Blades of Godric. FitIndia talk to me 07:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I draftify the article so that I can get the strong references to prove his notability I need five to six days. His invention is going viral in India. It has created waves in the field of artificial intelligence. --Mykanah (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This trick not going to work this time. Also, as previously advised you still need to disclose COI in your user page as well as in the article talk page per WP:DISCLOSE. Please see your talk page for more. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have topic banned Mykanah under WP:GS/Crypto. MER-C 08:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Non-notable company and non-notable company founder. Sam Sailor 08:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.