Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishandot
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bishandot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable village unsupported by references. Article is peacock and original research beyond repair with any attempts at salvage or highlighting reverted by what appears to be sock puppets. PRehse (talk) 10:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Villages are notable per WP:GEOLAND. The issues raised are a matter of ordinary editing per WP:IMPERFECT. Andrew D. (talk) 13:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I know that this article is not perfect but I told you that I am working to improve it. I will imply my improvements soon but it is not fair to delete anyone's article on personal problems. PRehse If you have any conflict with me, Talk with me!
we can negotiate it. Atizaz Kiyani (talk) 15:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This Village is notable per WP:GEOLAND. This article requires only minor edits and should be kept. Papurat (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- My apologies on the double vote. At the time, one of them was unsigned. SpinningSpark 16:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- No Problem Dear Friend. We are human beings, it is impossible for us to stop doing misunderstandings and mistakes. It is not your fault, Dear Brother.
- I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia. SpinningSpark 15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)