Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Santos Colado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not notable at the moment. Happy to restore to someone's draft space if requested but no editor has yet asked. Fenix down (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Santos Colado

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Player has not played in any fully professional league. RRD (talk) 02:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:06, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draft Needs a cleanup, and the fake stats removed, however [1] considering he just signed up to a fully-pro team in a fully pro league, I am betting he will pass soon. Govvy (talk) 12:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - as per Govvy, WP:TOOSOON. He's contracted to a team in a WP:FPL and stands at least a solid chance to appear in the future. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.